flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Green initiative may scuttle high-rise projects in Berkeley, California, critics charge

Green initiative may scuttle high-rise projects in Berkeley, California, critics charge

Measure would mandate LEED Platinum on new high-rise construction


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 4, 2014
View of Berkeley and Bay from Claremont Canyon. Photo: Urban via Wikimedia Commo
View of Berkeley and Bay from Claremont Canyon. Photo: Urban via Wikimedia Commons

Volunteers in Berkeley, Calif., are collecting signatures for the “Green Downtown & Public Commons Initiative,” a controversial measure that critics charge would halt some development in the city. The initiative has higher green standards and less flexible design guidelines—factors that developers say could stop two major projects, a proposed 180-foot high hotel and a 17-story apartment tower.

The initiative would mandate that developers planning a project taller than 60 feet use the “Green Pathways” provision of the Downtown Area Plan. This rule—currently optional—says that a developer can provide a higher level of community benefits in exchange for a fast-track approval process. Under Green Pathways, developers have to make structures LEED Platinum rather than LEED Gold; build more parking; include spaces for bicycles, electric cars and the handicapped; pay prevailing wages to construction and hotel workers; and make sure that half of a project’s construction workers are Berkeley residents.

The financial proposition for a high-rise hotel in Berkeley is fragile, according to a representative of the proposed hotel, and the new initiative would require additional setbacks and restrictions that would make it impossible to have enough rooms on each floor to make the project viable. The initiative calls for a minimum 15-foot setback, but the hotel developer says the structure must have a 10-foot setback to have enough space per floor.

City Councilman Jesse Arreguín, who supports the measure, says it is not intended to stop development, but is a way of getting developers to contribute more benefits to the downtown area.

(http://www.berkeleyside.com/2014/05/14/would-new-green-initiative-kill-two-downtown-high-rises/comment-page-1/)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Dec 21, 2015

Changing building codes to protect against mass shootings at odds with other safety measures

Fire and other emergencies require getting people out quickly, not locking down sections.  

Codes and Standards | Dec 18, 2015

Codes should be updated to reflect lessons learned from recent extreme weather events

More can be done to boost resiliency to flooding, extended power outages.

Codes and Standards | Dec 1, 2015

More than 50 design, construction, and real estate firms urge action on climate change

Call for policymakers to move on one of the ‘greatest economic opportunities of the 21st Century’

Codes and Standards | Oct 26, 2015

Chicago suburb considers bird collision deterrent requirement on all new buildings

The rule would mandate that new commercial, multifamily structures comply with LEED pilot program.

Codes and Standards | Oct 16, 2015

Anchorage may raise building height restrictions that would block precious winter sunlight

Controversial measure is part of plan to spur development.

Codes and Standards | Oct 9, 2015

New California law means commercial building benchmarking program will be implemented

Multifamily housing to be included, a first for a U.S. state.

Codes and Standards | Oct 2, 2015

New ASHRAE guideline for commissioning existing systems and assemblies

Focuses on optimum facility and system operation.

Codes and Standards | Sep 18, 2015

New RELi standard addresses disaster resilience

Based on LEED model, may help lower insurance rates  

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021