flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Green initiative may scuttle high-rise projects in Berkeley, California, critics charge

Green initiative may scuttle high-rise projects in Berkeley, California, critics charge

Measure would mandate LEED Platinum on new high-rise construction


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 4, 2014
View of Berkeley and Bay from Claremont Canyon. Photo: Urban via Wikimedia Commo
View of Berkeley and Bay from Claremont Canyon. Photo: Urban via Wikimedia Commons

Volunteers in Berkeley, Calif., are collecting signatures for the “Green Downtown & Public Commons Initiative,” a controversial measure that critics charge would halt some development in the city. The initiative has higher green standards and less flexible design guidelines—factors that developers say could stop two major projects, a proposed 180-foot high hotel and a 17-story apartment tower.

The initiative would mandate that developers planning a project taller than 60 feet use the “Green Pathways” provision of the Downtown Area Plan. This rule—currently optional—says that a developer can provide a higher level of community benefits in exchange for a fast-track approval process. Under Green Pathways, developers have to make structures LEED Platinum rather than LEED Gold; build more parking; include spaces for bicycles, electric cars and the handicapped; pay prevailing wages to construction and hotel workers; and make sure that half of a project’s construction workers are Berkeley residents.

The financial proposition for a high-rise hotel in Berkeley is fragile, according to a representative of the proposed hotel, and the new initiative would require additional setbacks and restrictions that would make it impossible to have enough rooms on each floor to make the project viable. The initiative calls for a minimum 15-foot setback, but the hotel developer says the structure must have a 10-foot setback to have enough space per floor.

City Councilman Jesse Arreguín, who supports the measure, says it is not intended to stop development, but is a way of getting developers to contribute more benefits to the downtown area.

(http://www.berkeleyside.com/2014/05/14/would-new-green-initiative-kill-two-downtown-high-rises/comment-page-1/)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Sep 28, 2016

Society of Landscape Architects releases guide to resilient design

The goal is to retrofit communities to better withstand extreme weather events.

Codes and Standards | Sep 22, 2016

Construction firms pulling back from federal market due to new reporting rules

‘Subjective, very vague’ policies  are said to create too much risk.

Codes and Standards | Sep 21, 2016

Airbnb presents legal liability for multifamily owners

How building owners can reduce risks.

Codes and Standards | Sep 21, 2016

Healthy buildings becoming a key design priority for both architects and building owners

Nationwide survey finds nearly three of four architects cite health impacts influencing design decisions

Data Centers | Sep 19, 2016

New ANSI/ASHRAE data center standard is performance-based, more flexible

The aim of the standard was to ‘not stifle innovation.’

Codes and Standards | Sep 16, 2016

Calm weather tidal flooding impacting several communities on East and Gulf Coasts

Local officials face the prospect of costly mitigation projects.

Codes and Standards | Sep 15, 2016

OSHA appoints new director for its construction directorate

The forty-year industry veteran has been a GC and business owner.

Energy | Sep 13, 2016

Oberlin College to hold conference on post-fossil fuel economy

The gathering will address climate change and new sources of energy.

Industry Research | Sep 12, 2016

Evidence linking classroom design to improved learning mounts

A study finds the impact can be as much as 25% per year.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021