flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Green initiative may scuttle high-rise projects in Berkeley, California, critics charge

Green initiative may scuttle high-rise projects in Berkeley, California, critics charge

Measure would mandate LEED Platinum on new high-rise construction


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 4, 2014
View of Berkeley and Bay from Claremont Canyon. Photo: Urban via Wikimedia Commo
View of Berkeley and Bay from Claremont Canyon. Photo: Urban via Wikimedia Commons

Volunteers in Berkeley, Calif., are collecting signatures for the “Green Downtown & Public Commons Initiative,” a controversial measure that critics charge would halt some development in the city. The initiative has higher green standards and less flexible design guidelines—factors that developers say could stop two major projects, a proposed 180-foot high hotel and a 17-story apartment tower.

The initiative would mandate that developers planning a project taller than 60 feet use the “Green Pathways” provision of the Downtown Area Plan. This rule—currently optional—says that a developer can provide a higher level of community benefits in exchange for a fast-track approval process. Under Green Pathways, developers have to make structures LEED Platinum rather than LEED Gold; build more parking; include spaces for bicycles, electric cars and the handicapped; pay prevailing wages to construction and hotel workers; and make sure that half of a project’s construction workers are Berkeley residents.

The financial proposition for a high-rise hotel in Berkeley is fragile, according to a representative of the proposed hotel, and the new initiative would require additional setbacks and restrictions that would make it impossible to have enough rooms on each floor to make the project viable. The initiative calls for a minimum 15-foot setback, but the hotel developer says the structure must have a 10-foot setback to have enough space per floor.

City Councilman Jesse Arreguín, who supports the measure, says it is not intended to stop development, but is a way of getting developers to contribute more benefits to the downtown area.

(http://www.berkeleyside.com/2014/05/14/would-new-green-initiative-kill-two-downtown-high-rises/comment-page-1/)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | May 16, 2018

New resources offer tips on off-site construction

NIBS documents address using pre-cast concrete, and commercial and legal considerations of modular construction.

Codes and Standards | May 15, 2018

Blast testing of loaded mass timber structures yields positive results

Four tests covered a spectrum of blast loads.

Codes and Standards | May 14, 2018

Maryland makes general contractors liable for failure of subs to pay employees

GCs could have to pay for up to three times the wages owed.

Codes and Standards | May 10, 2018

Data collection, machine learning boost building efficiency

Sensors, software algorithms squeeze out waste.

Codes and Standards | May 9, 2018

OSHA and state safety agencies write more than 100 silica citations in 6 months

Actions tending to come with investigation of other site conditions.

Codes and Standards | May 8, 2018

Powerhouse coalition builds energy positive buildings

The goal: build buildings that provide more power than they cost to build, run, and demolish.

Codes and Standards | May 7, 2018

Plan advances in Los Angeles for Climate Emergency Mobilization Department

Would oversee efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across the city.

Codes and Standards | May 3, 2018

Data collection, machine learning boost building efficiency

Sensors, software algorithms squeeze out waste.

Codes and Standards | May 1, 2018

ASHRAE publishes new energy simulation-aided design standard

Requires building energy modeling during schematic design.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021