flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Green initiative may scuttle high-rise projects in Berkeley, California, critics charge

Green initiative may scuttle high-rise projects in Berkeley, California, critics charge

Measure would mandate LEED Platinum on new high-rise construction


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 4, 2014
View of Berkeley and Bay from Claremont Canyon. Photo: Urban via Wikimedia Commo
View of Berkeley and Bay from Claremont Canyon. Photo: Urban via Wikimedia Commons

Volunteers in Berkeley, Calif., are collecting signatures for the “Green Downtown & Public Commons Initiative,” a controversial measure that critics charge would halt some development in the city. The initiative has higher green standards and less flexible design guidelines—factors that developers say could stop two major projects, a proposed 180-foot high hotel and a 17-story apartment tower.

The initiative would mandate that developers planning a project taller than 60 feet use the “Green Pathways” provision of the Downtown Area Plan. This rule—currently optional—says that a developer can provide a higher level of community benefits in exchange for a fast-track approval process. Under Green Pathways, developers have to make structures LEED Platinum rather than LEED Gold; build more parking; include spaces for bicycles, electric cars and the handicapped; pay prevailing wages to construction and hotel workers; and make sure that half of a project’s construction workers are Berkeley residents.

The financial proposition for a high-rise hotel in Berkeley is fragile, according to a representative of the proposed hotel, and the new initiative would require additional setbacks and restrictions that would make it impossible to have enough rooms on each floor to make the project viable. The initiative calls for a minimum 15-foot setback, but the hotel developer says the structure must have a 10-foot setback to have enough space per floor.

City Councilman Jesse Arreguín, who supports the measure, says it is not intended to stop development, but is a way of getting developers to contribute more benefits to the downtown area.

(http://www.berkeleyside.com/2014/05/14/would-new-green-initiative-kill-two-downtown-high-rises/comment-page-1/)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Aug 28, 2018

New York’s green roof program needs reform

Despite incentives, few owners add vegetative roofs.

Codes and Standards | Aug 23, 2018

Cities promote deconstruction of old homes with mixed results

Market factors complicate efforts to recycle material from old structures.

Codes and Standards | Aug 22, 2018

Oregon is first state to change building code to allow tall mass timber buildings

Statewide alternate method allows early technical consideration and approval.

Codes and Standards | Aug 21, 2018

First mass timber panel made from structural composite lumber gets APA certification

Said to be much more cost effective than CLT options.

Codes and Standards | Aug 17, 2018

Zoning changes can be crucial to filling large, empty retail spaces

Alternative uses often require action by local officials.

Codes and Standards | Aug 16, 2018

Nearly a quarter of opioid overdose deaths attributable to construction workers

Massachusetts public health study finds pressure to work in pain contributes to problem.

Codes and Standards | Aug 15, 2018

ICC creates new committee on building safety and security

Will include experts from many different disciplines.

Codes and Standards | Aug 14, 2018

Philadelphia adopts 2018 IECC energy code, while state opts for 2015 code

City is one of the first jurisdictions to adopt newest code.

Codes and Standards | Aug 9, 2018

Denver’s goal of 100% renewable energy by 2030 includes net zero energy buildings

Community solar programs for low income residents part of plan.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021