Company | 2014 Healthcare Revenue ($) | |
1 | AECOM | $458,485,000 |
2 | Jacobs | $93,920,000 |
3 | Burns & McDonnell | $42,896,090 |
4 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $37,500,000 |
5 | Smith Seckman Reid | $35,847,890 |
6 | WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff | $34,188,822 |
7 | STV | $32,678,000 |
8 | BR+A Consulting Engineers | $29,900,000 |
9 | Affiliated Engineers | $29,396,000 |
10 | TTG | $23,329,590 |
11 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | $19,155,210 |
12 | Mazzetti | $18,366,652 |
13 | Dewberry | $17,353,332 |
14 | Arup | $16,859,074 |
15 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $14,850,912 |
16 | Syska Hennessy Group | $13,603,317 |
17 | I. C. Thomasson Associates | $12,500,000 |
18 | Thornton Tomasetti | $12,222,812 |
19 | Zak Companies | $12,116,398 |
20 | Degenkolb Engineers | $11,550,443 |
21 | Heapy Engineering | $9,865,880 |
22 | ME Engineers | $9,450,000 |
23 | Henderson Engineers | $9,252,613 |
24 | Vanderweil Engineers | $7,019,300 |
25 | Walter P Moore | $6,334,976 |
26 | Karpinski Engineering | $5,800,000 |
27 | Apogee Consulting Group | $5,618,896 |
28 | Dunham Associates | $5,600,000 |
29 | Environmental Systems Design | $5,502,651 |
30 | M/E Engineering | $5,399,798 |
31 | RMF Engineering | $5,294,000 |
32 | Newcomb & Boyd | $5,211,541 |
33 | SSOE Group | $5,089,564 |
34 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $5,086,000 |
35 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $5,000,000 |
36 | RDK Engineers | $4,912,000 |
37 | Wendel | $4,804,025 |
38 | Ross & Baruzzini | $4,799,844 |
39 | Coffman Engineers | $4,632,000 |
40 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $4,277,786 |
41 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering | $4,000,000 |
42 | KCI Technologies | $3,500,000 |
43 | Highland Associates | $3,500,000 |
44 | H.F. Lenz Company | $3,295,000 |
45 | Cardno Haynes Whaley | $3,123,054 |
46 | Jensen Hughes | $2,747,398 |
47 | Peter Basso Associates | $2,574,000 |
48 | CJL Engineering | $2,420,427 |
49 | KLH Engineers | $2,201,354 |
50 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $2,048,950 |
51 | Spectrum Engineers | $1,800,194 |
52 | GRAEF | $1,800,000 |
53 | Martin/Martin | $1,164,393 |
54 | P2S Engineering | $1,149,643 |
55 | Wick Fisher White | $1,132,000 |
56 | Epstein | $1,089,200 |
57 | ThermalTech Engineering | $1,000,000 |
58 | Wallace Engineering | $925,000 |
59 | William Tao & Associates | $895,320 |
60 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $565,000 |
61 | Primera Engineers | $476,164 |
62 | Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber | $400,000 |
63 | CTLGroup | $400,000 |
64 | Bala Consulting Engineers | $354,000 |
65 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $300,000 |
66 | Larson Design Group | $281,563 |
67 | DeSimone Consulting Engineers | $240,616 |
68 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $172,940 |
69 | Woolpert | $135,972 |
70 | Stanley Consultants | $111,103 |
71 | GHT Ltd. | $100,000 |
72 | TBC | $99,749 |
73 | LaBella Associates | $65,426 |
74 | Allegheny Design Services | $63,375 |
75 | Guernsey | $57,153 |
76 | Kamm Consulting | $48,155 |
77 | Leidos | $38,000 |
78 | Barge, Waggoner, Sumner and Cannon | $25,000 |
79 | G&W Engineering | $10,600 |
80 | GRW | $10,076 |
RETURN TO THE GIANTS 300 LANDING PAGE
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Aug 15, 2019
3 ‘Giant’ AEC market trends for 2019-2020
We’re starting to see a shift toward custom research, thanks in part to the influx of data, data tools, and analytics expertise in the AEC market.
Giants 400 | Aug 15, 2019
Top 100 Multifamily Sector Construction Firms for 2019
Lendlease, AECOM, Suffolk, Clark Group, and Gilbane top the rankings of the nation's largest multifamily sector contractors and construction management firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2019 Giants 300 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 15, 2019
Top 80 Multifamily Sector Engineering Firms for 2019
Kimley-Horn, WSP, Thornton Tomasetti, Jordan & Skala, and DeSimone Consulting Engineers head the rankings of the nation's largest multifamily sector engineering and engineering architecture (EA) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2019 Giants 300 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 15, 2019
Top 140 Multifamily Sector Architecture Firms for 2019
Humphreys & Partners, KTGY, SCB, CallisonRTKL, and Perkins Eastman top the rankings of the nation's largest multifamily sector architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2019 Giants 300 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 15, 2019
2019 Multifamily Giants Report: Apartment construction keeps moving along, but affordable housing lags behind
The latest trends and innovations in the $66 billion multifamily construction sector, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2019 Giants 300 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 13, 2019
Top 40 Science and Technology Sector Construction Firms for 2019
Skanska, DPR, McCarthy, Whiting-Turner, and Turner top the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) sector contractors and construction managers, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2019 Giants 300 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 13, 2019
Top 55 Science and Technology Sector Engineering Firms for 2019
Affiliated Engineers, Jacobs, WSP, RMF, and CRB head the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) sector engineering and engineering architecture (EA) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2019 Giants 300 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 13, 2019
Top 65 Science and Technology Sector Architecture Firms for 2019
HDR, Interior Architects, Perkins+Will, SmithGroup, and HOK top the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) sector architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2019 Giants 300 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 13, 2019
2019 Science + Technology Giants Report: Operational flexibility is a must for S+T buildings
The science and technology (S+T) sector is arguably the industry’s most complex because it caters to a diverse clientele with specific priorities and imperatives, according to Building Design+Construction's 2019 Giants 300 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 13, 2019
Perkins and Will tests a turnkey laboratory for S+T startups moving up from their incubation phase
The design giant has identified one critical need among S+T startups that want to graduate from their incubator stage: “step-out” labs.