Georgia Tech’s SimTigrate Design Lab and Dräger, an international supplier of medical and safety technology, have released a white paper that sets out to demonstrate the advantages for Intensive Care Units in hospitals of ceiling-mounted beam systems over traditional headwall systems or those operated with articulated arms or overhead booms.
One of this paper’s stated purposes is to understand how medical teams evaluate architectural solutions to medical gas delivery, and to compare user experiences with different overhead utilities in the ICU. Its opinions are based primarily on field observations of the use of booms in three hospitals, interviews with staff in other ICUs who have used the beam system, and a simulation conducted in a low-fidelity mockup with nurses, physicians and respiratory therapists from a hospital undergoing a renovation of its ICU patient rooms.
The paper is also a full-throated endorsement of Dräger’s beam system for ICUs, although it does not delve into cost comparisons among different delivery systems.
The paper observes that operating rooms in most hospitals already favor ceiling-mounted systems to deliver medical gases and supply power. As more patient care is provided at the bedside within ICUs, hospitals have replicated overhead service delivery solutions in those units to realize the same advantages of improved access to the head of the bed.
“Yet it is important to keep in mind that ICU rooms do not function exactly like operating rooms, and therefore may have different needs,” the paper states.
The white paper spells out the disadvantages of headwalls in ICUs (space, patient and equipment access, mobility). It also provides a number of reasons why overhead booms aren’t optimal, either.
For example, while overhead booms free up floor space,  “they are quite large and take up a lot of real estate in the patient room.” Due to limited space in most inpatient rooms, nurses routinely have to move both boom arms out of the way to move patients into or out of the room.
The flexibility of articulated boom arms has a downside, too, in that the arms can block critical views of such things as monitors.
Perhaps the biggest disadvantage of booms operating overhead is that they impede the use of patient lifts, because the range of a cross bar is limited by the boom and requires that the boom arms are pushed all the way forward, and the bed be moved further away from the wall, to gain access to the patient’s center of gravity.
Â
Â
Â
These illustrations compare patient access when an ICU room is equipped with a Ponta beam system (top) versus an articulated arm system. The Georgia Tech white paper says the biggest disadvantage of booms operating overhead or to the side of the bed is that they impede the use of patient lifts, because the range of a cross bar is limited by the boom and requires that the boom arms are pushed all the way forward, and the bed be moved further away from the wall, to gain access to the patient’s center of gravity. Image: “Comparison of Overhead Utility Systems for Intensive Care Rooms.”
Â
The bulk of this white paper is devoted to demonstrating the advantages of Dräger’s Ponta overhead beam system within an ICU environment.
It states that the Ponta beam takes up less space than an overhead boom, which is important for smaller inpatient rooms. The beam system allows nurses to move the shuttles (columns that suspend from the beam) laterally to come closer together to support infants in incubators or patients in chairs; or farther apart to support bariatric patients.
The columns are customizable for the specific needs of the ICU clinic and standardized across all rooms, such that the ventilator is always on the same side of the patient bed. The beam system allows staff to move the bed in and out of the room easier.
To back up its claims, Georgia Tech, with support from Dräger, the architectural firm HKS, and Grady Health System, conducted three simulation sessions on the Grady’s campus in downtown Atlanta to give the nurses, providers, and facility leadership an opportunity to try out the Ponta beam under real-life care situations.
A critical care doctor with Grady scripted a complex patient scenario that required bulky equipment, access to the head of the bed, and placed many people in the room.
The participants included nurses, doctors, and leadership from Grady’s medical ICU, as well as nurses from the Marcus Stroke and Neurosciences Center who were familiar with using a boom and could compare the performance of different delivery systems.
The 15 simulation participants who completed surveys rated the Ponta system positively in all categories. A dozen agreed or strongly agreed that the beam reduced clutter around the bed; 13 agreed or strongly agreed that the beam better organizes equipment, and 11 agreed or strongly agreed that the beam system is better for managing cables.
Clear majorities of participants also judged the beam system superior to overhead boom systems for providing better access to the patient and to gases and equipment, and better visibility to monitors.
“It is clear that ceiling-mounted solutions for delivery of utilities are far superior than the traditional headwall,” the report states. But unlike overhead boom systems, which were designed originally for operating rooms, Dräger’s Ponta beam system is specifically desgined for smaller inpatient room. The beam system also minimizes bulky infrastructure directly over the patient.
Perhaps the biggest advantage of the Ponta beam is that because it is not mounted directly over the center of the bed, that space is available for overhead patient lift tracks, making the patient lift more effective and easier to operate, which results in more frequent use.
Related Stories
| Dec 30, 2014
The future of healthcare facilities: new products, changing delivery models, and strategic relationships
Healthcare continues to shift toward Madison Avenue and Silicon Valley as it revamps business practices to focus on consumerism and efficiency, writes CBRE Healthcare's Patrick Duke.
| Dec 29, 2014
HDR and Hill International to turn three floors of a jail into a modern, secure healthcare center [BD+C's 2014 Great Solutions Report]
By bringing healthcare services in house, Dallas County Jail will greatly minimize the security risk and added cost of transferring ill or injured prisoners to a nearby hospital. The project was named a 2014 Great Solution by the editors of Building Design+Construction.
| Dec 29, 2014
New mobile unit takes the worry out of equipment sterilization during healthcare construction [BD+C's 2014 Great Solutions Report]
Infection control, a constant worry for hospital administrators and clinical staffs, is heightened when the hospital is undergoing a major construction project. Mobile Sterilization Solutions, a mobile sterile-processing department, is designed to simplify the task. The technology was named a 2014 Great Solution by the editors of Building Design+Construction.
| Dec 29, 2014
HealthSpot station merges personalized healthcare with videoconferencing [BD+C's 2014 Great Solutions Report]
The HealthSpot station is an 8x5-foot, ADA-compliant mobile kiosk that lets patients access a network of board-certified physicians through interactive videoconferencing and medical devices. It was named a 2014 Great Solution by the editors of Building Design+Construction.
BIM and Information Technology | Dec 28, 2014
The Big Data revolution: How data-driven design is transforming project planning
There are literally hundreds of applications for deep analytics in planning and design projects, not to mention the many benefits for construction teams, building owners, and facility managers. We profile some early successful applications. Â
| Dec 28, 2014
AIA course: Enhancing interior comfort while improving overall building efficacy
Providing more comfortable conditions to building occupants has become a top priority in today’s interior designs. This course is worth 1.0 AIA LU/HSW.
| Dec 2, 2014
Nonresidential construction spending rebounds in October
This month's increase in nonresidential construction spending is far more consistent with the anecdotal information floating around the industry, says ABC's Chief Economist Anirban Basu.
| Dec 1, 2014
How public-private partnerships can help with public building projects
Minimizing lifecycle costs and transferring risk to the private sector are among the benefits to applying the P3 project delivery model on public building projects, according to experts from Skanska USA.Â
| Nov 25, 2014
Emerging design and operation strategies for the ambulatory team in transition
As healthcare systems shift their care models to be more responsive to patient-centered care, ambulatory care teams need to be positioned to operate efficiently in their everyday work environments, write CannonDesign Health Practice leaders Tonia Burnette and Mike Pukszta.
| Nov 20, 2014
Lean Led Design: How Building Teams can cut costs, reduce waste in healthcare construction projects
Healthcare organizations are under extreme pressure to reduce costs, writes CBRE Healthcare's Lora Schwartz. Tools like Lean Led Design are helping them cope.