An emerging design paradigm is having a major impact on the world of university campus planning and design—fusion facilities. As the name implies, fusion facilities bring together two or more campus programs previously housed in separate buildings into a single location. Some pair recreation programs with student life services. Others add wellness programs to the mix. One unusual combination fused a recreation program with nursing and kinesiology departments. However they are configured, these fusion facilities offer a new model and a new perspective on design to the nation’s 4,495 Title IV-eligible, degree-granting institutions.
The most practical consideration fueling this nascent movement is initial cost. We estimate—and this can vary, depending on project assumptions—that building a single large-scale facility rather than multiple structures can save 10-15% on total construction costs: perhaps 5-10% from MEP savings, and another 5% from shared classrooms, conference rooms, and common spaces.
EIGHT SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS
of fusion facilities
Fusion facilities can offer colleges and universities at least eight key benefits:1. Elimination of redundant space
2. Increased utilization of the facility
3. Highly leveraged integrated technology
4. More flexibility to meet changing space demands
5. New revenue sources
6. Creative funding options
7. Student buy-in on fee referenda
8. Enhanced student recruitment and retention
But there is a much more overriding factor than cost savings at work here—although your client won’t mind saving $3-4½ million on a typical $30 million project. As universities extend their reach to embody the entire student learning experience—mental, physical, and emotional—broadening the scope of their facilities to respond to that agenda makes perfect sense. Through the incorporation of fusion facilities, Building Teams and their university clients can take the long view and look at facility models from a broader vantage point, beyond immediate programming demands to a consideration of the diverse needs of today’s students.
Consider the case of George Mason University, in Arlington, Va. Its new 256,000-sf Founders Hall takes in the School of Public Policy, a 300-seat auditorium, a 6,000-sf multipurpose room, a lounge, café, campus bookstore, 160,000 sf of parking, and a multistory campus library, as well as classroom space that it shares with the previously completed 140,000-sf law school.
Then there’s Mesa (Ariz.) Community College. Two separate departments, nursing and exercise science, were bursting at the seams in inadequate facilities. When a couple of vacated buildings on campus became available, instead of putting each program in its own building, the college—on the advice of the faculty of both departments—opted for a “fused” interior fitout, renovation, and 11,000-sf addition. The Mesa Community College Health-Wellness Building is now helping to generate synergies between two previously disparate academic departments.
FUSING RECREATION AND STUDENT LIFE
One trend that is gaining momentum is the fusion between recreation and student life. Both are critical components of the student experience in that they provide activities to engage students beyond academic study; thus, their synthesis into one facility creates new opportunities for planned and spontaneous student interaction.
Combining such programs creates more shared space, reduces redundant program areas, and promotes cross-pollination between student life and recreation departments, encouraging students who arrive at the facility for one reason to stay and use it for another.
A related trend is the integration of recreation and wellness programs in a single facility. There is growing awareness of and concern for wellness and the mind-body connection at the nation’s colleges and universities. As a result, higher education institutions have strengthened their commitment to providing students with wellness-focused programs to promote student health, disease prevention, and support for mental health efforts. Since one of the best ways to improve student education is to focus on the total student experience, paying close attention to these wellness factors is essential.
Beyond this obvious benefit, many college recreation programs are often intertwined with academic wellness programs like athletic training, exercise science, and biomechanics research. Fused recreation and wellness facilities are ideal for joint programming such as educational seminars, wellness fairs, group exercise classes, and medical testing. On-site commercial retail ventures like pharmacies and fitness retail are natural fits. Rice University’s Barbara & David Gibbs Recreation and Wellness Center houses both massage therapy and acupuncture services.
The benefits of these hybrid facilities extend far beyond a simple combination of building programs.
1. ELIMINATION OF REDUNDANT SPACE
Fusion facilities allow multiple departments or activities to share typical “service” spaces like lobbies, lockers, foodservice, and lounges, eliminating the need for redundant areas in multiple neighboring buildings. Combined facilities also facilitate the creation of additional program areas that one department on its own might not be able to justify or afford for its own separate facility.
This phenomenon was recently borne out at Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi’s new fusion facility. Originally slated only to house recreation, this 148,000-sf facility now supports recreation, athletics, nursing, and kinesiology. We estimate that combining these uses trimmed the amount of redundant program space roughly 7%: 4,000 sf in lobby space, 3,000 in joint instructional space, 2,000 in circulation space, 1,000 in MEP space, and 400 in walls and columns—10,400 sf, about 7% of this 148,000-sf facility.
But fusing these departments under one roof did more than just increase efficiencies: It actually made the whole greater than the sum of its parts. For example, due to budget and physical constraints, the original design for the single-use rec center did not allow for a running track for the recreation department. Adding the kinesiology department to the project meant that a running track and gymnasium had to be included in the budget, since kinesiology needed these facilities for its lab work, although it only utilized them half the time.
With the fused program, the recreation department gained access to the running track plus an additional gym and multipurpose rooms (when not in use by the academic departments). The result: valuable additional space for the recreation department at no added cost.
2. INCREASED UTILIZATION OF THE FACILITY
It may come as something of a surprise to learn that some college and university recreation centers struggle to attract students after traditional class hours, or lose critical mass at various points during the day. This was true for Pomona College, in Claremont, Calif. Its student center, originally built in 1999, was seen as dignified but unattractive to students; in fact, they literally walked around it to avoid walking through it.
A high-impact renovation transformed Smith Campus Center into a more youth-oriented space without abandoning sophistication or compromising its symbolic importance. Its multifaceted program included study rooms, a writing center, dining areas, a pub, a nightclub, and an outdoor amphitheater, making it a locus for student activity at all hours of the day.
The Pomona College case illustrates how a fusion environment can be alive and vibrant throughout the day. From breakfast in the dining room to a lunch study session in the lounge; from an afternoon workout to dinner with friends at poolside, then on to an evening at the campus nightclub, fusion facilities can literally provide a one-stop venue for enhancing student life.
3. HIGHLY LEVERAGED INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY
The current crop of undergrads and graduate students expect technology, accessibility, online interaction, and social networking at all levels. Fusion facilities provide the perfect environment for this virtual interaction to occur. WiFi and Internet connections and group meeting rooms make the space optimal for studying. Exercise equipment that charges an iPod or iPhone or has built-in monitors facilitates multi-tasking. Lounges with flat screen TVs offer students a cozy place to relax. Gaming spaces allow students to participate in “exergaming” or multiplayer tournaments that foster student interaction and camaraderie.
At the University of Texas–Austin’s Gregory Gym, students requested more outlets for charging laptops in addition to wireless Internet access. With the shift in academics from individual to group projects, gym staff has seen a growing number of student groups utilizing these spaces for study sessions, not just for exercise.
FLEXIBILITY it’s the key at Central Michigan’s Events Center
At the Central Michigan University Events Center, in Mount Pleasant, spaces were designed with multiple functions in mind to encourage utilization by athletics, recreation, student affairs, and public groups.
The 72,560-sf venue features retractable seating on the lower level to allow the event floor to be expanded to accommodate additional guests or to modify the court layout to suit different sports or activities. Practice facilities located next to the arena can be booked by club, athletic, and recreation groups. The 15,200-sf concourse and lobby doubles as a banquet space. CMU officials agree that the key element in the facility’s success is the flexibility it offers through shared activity space and support areas.
The multipurpose nature of the facility was a top priority. The Events Center currently supports concerts, speaking engagements, events, educational courses, recreation activities, summer camp programs, and graduations. It also serves as the primary practice and competition venue for men’s and women’s basketball, wrestling, volleyball, and gymnastics.
Since its opening in November 2010, more than 100,000 fans have attended athletic events there, and more than 5,000 prospective students utilized the facility in last summer’s camp program. Thousands of students and community members have participated in programs in the past year or so.
4. MORE FLEXIBILITY TO MEET CHANGING SPACE DEMANDS
Combining multiple services into a single facility can give user groups greater flexibility in the kinds of programs they can hold. Fusions can also enable the administration to accommodate ever-changing demand. Recreation facilities typically have large gyms or multipurpose spaces that can easily be adapted for other event functions, such as camps, commencement exercises, or concerts.
Designing these facilities with flexible multipurpose spaces as well as back-of-the-house preparation areas makes fusion facilities desirable to a whole new set of user groups. Therefore, the facility design must be able to readily accommodate changes in activities, groups, and settings. Creating this adaptability is critical to ensuring that the facility will be utilized to its fullest.
Having this kind of flexibility can have enormous payoff for the institution. For example, the University of Texas–Austin’s Gregory Gym started the 2010-2011 academic year with a speaking engagement by President Obama and concluded it by hosting 25,000 family and friends for various commencement activities. “In between those bookends, there were 5,500 reservations in the facility by 275 different on-campus organizations, very few of which dealt with recreation,” said Tom Dison, Associate Vice President for Student Affairs and Director of Recreational Sports at UT–Austin. Built-in space flexibility was critical in making these events possible.
5. NEW SOURCES OF REVENUE
Though campus groups are typically not charged for facility use, outside users have to pay a fee. Non-university-sponsored events, such as private summer camps or community-initiated programs, can generate revenue for fusion facilities. For example, Rice University’s recreation/wellness fusion center generates about one-sixth of its annual program budget from summer camps. Integration of events like these optimizes facility usage, especially during non-peak seasons like the summer, and creates additional sources of revenue.
6. CREATIVE FUNDING OPTIONS
Because some fusion facilities support various combinations of recreation, student life, and academic programs, they may be able to take advantage of creative funding options that might not be available for single-use buildings.
As noted above, Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi originally planned to build a new 70,000-sf standalone recreation center. Shortly after beginning the design process, the university introduced a second phase of 150,000 sf for the nursing and kinesiology programs. At that time, Phase II was in its infancy with no scheduled start or completion date.
Funding for Phase I was to be provided through a student referendum; with the addition of the Phase II academic component, however, the university was required to issue bonds to finance the project. A struggling economy, along with increased difficulty in passing bonds, led the administration to package the Phase I recreation center with the Phase II academic building under one bond. Fusing the programs into one facility enabled the university to obtain funding to move ahead with the design and construction of all programs under one roof.
7. STUDENT BUY-IN ON FEE REFERENDA
Fees to fund these kinds of facilities often come from fee increases approved through student referenda. Hybrid facilities typically garner greater student support than single-use facilities because they appeal to more constituencies. It is important to advise your collegiate clients to keep in mind the diverse needs of current students in order to rally more widespread support for fusion facilities.
MADONNA UNIVERSITY fusion facility melds science and media
Madonna University’s Franciscan Center for Science and Media takes fusion to the nth degree. The 65,000-sf LEED Gold center, which opened in October 2009, combines two fast-growing but seemingly unrelated curricula—science and broadcast media/cinema arts—neither of which could have afforded a new facility on its own.
The comprehensive science program takes in biology, microbiology, genetics, organic and physical chemistry, quantum physics, and astronomy, with instrumental and computational research labs, classrooms, and seminar rooms. The broadcast media and cinema arts portion of the $20 million facility houses digital radio and TV studios along with a video editing suite and a 150-seat lecture hall.
8. ENHANCED RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION
Many institutions of higher learning have begun to develop comprehensive recruitment and retention plans focused on the mental, physical, and emotional development of students. The plans go beyond the boundaries of standard textbook learning and seek to engage students more fully in campus life and thereby improve their overall satisfaction with the university experience.
For years, recreation professionals have struggled to develop outcome-based metrics to quantify the impact that campus recreation and student life facilities have on recruitment and retention. A 2006 APPA study by David Cain, PhD, and Gary L. Reynolds of nearly 16,000 students from 46 institutions across the U.S. and Canada showed that 32.3% of students rated recreation facilities as “extremely or very important” in the university selection process. Another 35.6% rated exercise facilities and 14.8% rated intramural sports facilities as “extremely or very important.” While “facilities for [one’s] major” (73.6%), the institution’s library (53.6%), classrooms (49.6%), and residence halls (42.2%) were deemed more important by prospective students, recreation and student life facilities were seen by many as significant factors in their selection of a college or university.
Students at Stephen F. Austin State University in Nacogdoches, Texas, certainly made that point clear to administrators. According Steve Westbrook, Vice President for University Affairs, “Students feel that recreation facilities are important to attracting prospective students to SFA in the future.”
This was a major reason the university moved ahead with the construction of a new 78,000-sf fusion facility, which, with its new Indoor and outdoor facilities—including basketball and racquetball courts, a three-lane track, climbing wall and bouldering cave, exercise and weight rooms, pool, diving well, and lounge—have made it a hub of student activity on campus.
FUSION BUILDINGS AS CENTERPIECES OF CAMPUS LIFE
Because they respond directly to contemporary student expectations, fusion buildings may provide institutions with a competitive advantage. The buildings respond positively to today’s students’ call for the latest technology and on-demand services, while also helping the administration generate much-needed revenue and promote social interaction and cohesion on campus.
Nearly a decade ago, Roy V. Viklund and David L. Damon, two designers at Sasaki Associates, predicted that “combining collegiate facilities for student life and recreation may be the wave of the future.” They noted that many students make up their minds about a college within the first 15 minutes of a campus tour, and suggested that the combined student life/recreation center would be a good place to start and end such tours.
Today, many campus tours still start at the institution’s recreation center or student union. In the future, the best place to start might be the campus’s new fusion facility.
A FEW WORDS OF CAUTION ABOUT FUSION FACILITIES
Although the benefits of fusion facilities can be substantial, you should consider three potential pitfalls—scheduling conflicts, security concerns, and utility allocations—before advising your university clients to embark on such a project.
Scheduling multiple groups. The hybrid nature of fusion facilities can lead to significant conflict over space sharing and scheduling. This is especially true when your building houses multiple departments like recreation, athletics, and academic affairs, each of which may have unique space needs and schedules. Plans must be developed to avoid scheduling conflicts.
It took the staff at Central Michigan University’s Events Center a while to realize that the change to a fusion facility might necessitate a change in organizational structure to accommodate scheduling difficulties. When the building first opened in late 2010, athletics, recreation, club sports, and event leaders were allowed to schedule the facility on their own. That proved chaotic, and now the departments must book the facility through a central office.
The new approach enables all user groups, including club sports, to have equitable access to the facility. “We would not have been successful had we not made this change in the way we operate,” says Stan Shingles, CMU’s Assistant Vice President for University Recreation, Events, and Conferences.
Dealing with security concerns. Security is a major concern on college campuses, but it becomes even more critical when institutions have facilities that are open late or that stay open 24 hours a day. Design considerations like lighting and building access become critical in making fusion facilities safe for students at all hours of the day.
To address security concerns raised by having multiple access points at the Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi fusion facility, the university installed controlled-access points between the recreation and academic programs. These access points close after a certain hour to force student traffic into the front entrance of the recreation facility.
Managing utility charges. Because certain components of fusion facilities—notably recreation—must pay their own way through student fees, the complex should be appropriately metered and its electricity use carefully monitored so that energy costs for pay-as-you-go components can be separated from the facility’s total billings.
At Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi, electricity metering made it possible for the recreation component’s bill to be calculated separately from those of the nursing and kinesiology programs. +
--
David Mills (david.mills@smithgroupjjr.com) is a Principal and Senior Architect at SmithGroupJJR. A member of the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association, he holds both BArch and MArch degrees from the University of Texas at Arlington.
Michael Medici (mike.medici@smithgroupjjr.com) is SmithGroupJJR’s Senior Vice President and Learning Practice Leader. He has directed the firm’s Phoenix office since 1989. A member of the Society for College and University Planning, he holds a BArch degree from Lawrence Technological University, which granted him its Distinguished Alumni Award.
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES ON FUSION BUILDINGS
“Rec Centers – Centers of Attention,” Roy V. Viklund and David L. Damon, Athletic Business, November 2002.
“Educating the Whole Student: The Growing Importance of Student Affairs,” Arthur Sandeen, Change, May-June 2004, v36 no. 3, 28-33.
“The Impact of Facilities on Recruitment and Retention of Students,” David Cain and Gary L. Reynolds, Facilities Manager, March/April 2006, v22 no. 2, 54-60.
“Recreating Retention,” Jill Moffitt, Recreational Sports Journal, 2010, v34 no. 1, 24-33.
“Hybrid Student Centers House Multiple Campus Functions,” Paul Steinbach, Athletic
Related Stories
| Feb 11, 2011
Justice center on Fall River harbor serves up daylight, sustainable elements, including eucalyptus millwork
Located on historic South Main Street in Fall River, Mass., the Fall River Justice Center opened last fall to serve as the city’s Superior and District Courts building. The $85 million facility was designed by Boston-based Finegold Alexander + Associates Inc., with Dimeo Construction as CM and Arup as MEP. The 154,000-sf courthouse contains nine courtrooms, a law library, and a detention area. Most of the floors have the same ceiling height, which will makes them easier to reconfigure in the future as space needs change. Designed to achieve LEED Silver, the facility’s elliptical design offers abundant natural daylight and views of the harbor. Renewable eucalyptus millwork is one of the sustainable features.
| Feb 11, 2011
Research facility separates but also connects lab spaces
California State University, Northridge, consolidated its graduate and undergraduate biology and mathematics programs into one 90,000-sf research facility. Architect of record Cannon Design worked on the new Chaparral Hall, creating a four-story facility with two distinct spaces that separate research and teaching areas; these are linked by faculty offices to create collaborative spaces. The building houses wet research, teaching, and computational research labs, a 5,000-sf vivarium, classrooms, and administrative offices. A four-story outdoor lobby and plaza and an outdoor staircase provide orientation. A covered walkway links the new facility with the existing science complex. Saiful/Bouquet served as structural engineer, Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers served as MEP, and Research Facilities Design was laboratory consultant.
| Feb 11, 2011
A feast of dining options at University of Colorado community center, but hold the buffalo stew
The University of Colorado, Boulder, cooked up something different with its new $84.4 million Center for Community building, whose 900-seat foodservice area consists of 12 micro-restaurants, each with its own food options and décor. Centerbrook Architects of Connecticut collaborated with Denver’s Davis Partnership Architects and foodservice designer Baker Group of Grand Rapids, Mich., on the 323,000-sf facility, which also includes space for a career center, international education, and counseling and psychological services. Exterior walls of rough-hewn, variegated sandstone and a terra cotta roof help the new facility blend with existing campus buildings. Target: LEED Gold.
| Feb 11, 2011
Chicago high-rise mixes condos with classrooms for Art Institute students
The Legacy at Millennium Park is a 72-story, mixed-use complex that rises high above Chicago’s Michigan Avenue. The glass tower, designed by Solomon Cordwell Buenz, is mostly residential, but also includes 41,000 sf of classroom space for the School of the Art Institute of Chicago and another 7,400 sf of retail space. The building’s 355 one-, two-, three-, and four-bedroom condominiums range from 875 sf to 9,300 sf, and there are seven levels of parking. Sky patios on the 15th, 42nd, and 60th floors give owners outdoor access and views of Lake Michigan.
| Feb 11, 2011
Iowa surgery center addresses both inpatient and outpatient care
The 12,000-person community of Carroll, Iowa, has a new $28 million surgery center to provide both inpatient and outpatient care. Minneapolis-based healthcare design firm Horty Elving headed up the four-story, 120,000-sf project for St. Anthony’s Regional Hospital. The center’s layout is based on a circular process flow, and includes four 800-sf operating rooms with poured rubber floors to reduce leg fatigue for surgeons and support staff, two substerile rooms between each pair of operating rooms, and two endoscopy rooms adjacent to the outpatient prep and recovery rooms. Recovery rooms are clustered in groups of four. The large family lounge (left) has expansive windows with views of the countryside, and television monitors that display coded information on patient status so loved ones can follow a patient’s progress.
| Feb 11, 2011
Grocery store anchors shopping center in Miami arts/entertainment district
18Biscayne is a 57,200-sf urban retail center being developed in downtown Miami by commercial real estate firm Stiles. Construction on the three-story center is being fast-tracked for completion in early 2012. The project is anchored by a 49,200-sf Publix market with bakery, pharmacy, and café with outdoor seating. An additional 8,000 sf of retail space will front Biscayne Boulevard. The complex is in close proximity to the Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts, the downtown Miami entertainment district, and the Omni neighborhood, one of the city’s fast-growing residential areas.
| Feb 11, 2011
Chicago architecture firm planning one of China’s tallest towers
Chicago-based Goettsch Partners was commissioned by developer Guangzhou R&F Properties Co. Ltd. to design a new 294,570-sm mixed-use tower in Tianjin, China. The Tianjin R&F Guangdong Tower will be located within the city’s newly planned business district, and at 439 meters it will be one of China’s tallest buildings. The massive complex will feature 134,900 sm of Class A office space, a 400-key, five-star hotel, 55 condominiums, and 8,550 sm of retail space. The architects are designing the tower with multi-story atriums and a high-performance curtain wall to bring daylight deep into the building, thereby creating deeper lease spans. The project is currently finishing design.
| Feb 11, 2011
Two projects seek to reinvigorate Los Angeles County medical center
HMC Architects designed two new buildings for the Los Angeles County Martin Luther King, Jr., Medical Center as part of a $360 million plan to reinvigorate the campus. The buildings include a 120-bed hospital, which involves renovation of an existing tower and several support buildings, and the construction of a new multi-service ambulatory care center. The new facilities will have large expanses of glass at all waiting and public areas for unobstructed views of downtown Los Angeles. A curved glass entrance canopy will unite the two buildings. When both projects are completed—the hospital in 2012 and the ambulatory care center in 2013—the campus will have added more than 460,000 sf of space. The hospital will seek LEED certification, while the ambulatory care center is targeting LEED Silver.
| Feb 11, 2011
Sustainable community center to serve Angelinos in need
Harbor Interfaith Services, a nonprofit serving the homeless and working poor in the Harbor Area and South Bay communities of Los Angeles, engaged Withee Malcolm Architects to design a new 15,000-sf family resource center. The architects, who are working pro bono for the initial phase, created a family-centered design that consolidates all programs into a single building. The new three-story space will house a resource center, food pantry, nursery and pre-school, and administrative offices, plus indoor and outdoor play spaces and underground parking. The building’s scale and setbacks will help it blend with its residential neighbors, while its low-flow fixtures, low-VOC and recycled materials, and energy-efficient mechanical equipment and appliances will help it earn LEED certification.
| Feb 11, 2011
Texas megachurch inspired by yesteryear’s materials, today’s design vocabulary
The third phase of The First Baptist Church of Pasadena, Texas, involves construction of a new 115,000-sf worship center addition. Currently in design by Zeigler Cooper, the project will include a 2,500-seat worship center (with circular layout and space for a 50-person orchestra and 200-person choir), a 500-seat chapel (for weddings, funerals, and special events), and a prayer room. The addition will connect to the existing church and create a Christian Commons for education, administration, music, and fellowship. The church asked for a modern design that uses traditional materials, such as stone, brick, and stained glass. Construction is scheduled to begin this summer.
