flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Fire resistive blast and ballistic glass walls in high security facilities

Sponsored Content Glass and Glazing

Fire resistive blast and ballistic glass walls in high security facilities

For federal courthouses, embassies, government facilities and other high profile buildings, building materials are chosen based on their ability to mitigate or minimize the injuries and fatalities to occupants during an attack.


By SaftiFirst | June 20, 2016

Project:  Public Safety Facility in the East Coast
Architect: Skidmore Owings & Merrill
Glazing Contractor: W&W, LLC
Blast Consultant: Weidlinger Associates
Products: Fire Resistive/Blast Rated System with SuperLite II-XL 120 in GPX Blast Framing and Fire Resistive/Ballistic Rated System with SuperLite II-XL 120 in GPX Ballistic Framing.   

 

A building’s design is very much influenced by the function it performs and the perceived threats that it may face – whether it’s from natural disasters, accidents or terrorist attacks – with the latter being a foremost concern for federal courthouses, embassies, government facilities and other high profile buildings.  For these types of facilities, building materials are chosen based on their ability to mitigate or minimize the injuries and fatalities to occupants during an attack. Because of these security concerns, trade-offs have been made when it comes to daylighting, energy efficiency and aesthetics to name a few.  The good news is that today, high-performance security glazing make-ups are available in the market place to meet the level of protection needed while continuing to provide natural light and a feeling of openness.  These specialized systems can also blend with the surroundings seamlessly to enhance the building’s overall design. 

The 1995 bombing of the A.P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City revealed the devastating effects of high velocity glass fragments on people in the building or those in the vicinity when a blast occurs.  This prompted the General Services Administration (GSA) to establish a blast criteria for all glazing used in federal buildings, which was later on adopted by the Interagency Security Committee (ISC) to broaden its use.  Part of its approach is to quantify glass failure not in terms of whether breakage occurs, but rather the hazard it causes to occupants.  Today, the ISC Security Design Criteria Blast Protection Levels for Windows is the most widely recognized classification of design levels for glazing hazard protection:

Performance Condition

Protection Level

Hazard Level

Description of Window Glazing Response

1

Safe

None

Glazing does not break.  No visible damage to glazing or frame.

2

Very High

None

Glazing cracks but is retained by the frame.  Dusting or very small fragments near the sill or floor acceptable.

3a

High

Very Low

Glazing cracks.  Fragments enter space and land on floor no further than 3.3 ft. from the window.

3b

High

Low

Glazing cracks.  Fragments enter space and land on floor no further than 10 ft. from the window.

4

Medium

Medium

Glazing cracks.  Fragments enter space and land on floor and impact a vertical witness panel at a distance of no more than 10 ft. from the window at a height no greater than 2 ft. above the floor.

5

Low

High

Glazing cracks and window system fails catastrophically.  Fragments enter space and land on floor and impact a vertical witness panel at a distance of no more than 10 ft. from the window at a height greater than 2 ft. above the floor.

 

But what happens when the same blast rated glazing system must also meet 2-hour fire resistive requirements, as well as deliver maximum transparency and seamlessly blend with the existing non-rated systems?

Such was the case with a public safety facility located in the east coast of the United States.  The glass wall between the secure entrance and main lobby had to meet both ASTM E-119/NFPA 251 for 2 hours with hose stream as well as Performance Condition 2 of the ISC Security Design Criteria Blast Protection Levels for Windows.  Additionally, the assembly had to meet the requirements in UFC 3-340-02, Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions, UFC 4-020-01, Department of Defense Security Engineering Facilities Planning Manual and UFC 4-010-01, Department of Defense Minimum Anti-Terrorism Standards for Buildings.  There was also an adjacent glass wall by the security officer’s desk that had to meet ASTM E-119/NFPA 251 for 2 hours and UL 752 Level 4 Ballistic.

Given the strict requirements of this project, SAFTI FIRST submitted a certified blast engineering report to the building team for the fire resistive, blast rated system, as well as provide a visual mock-up of the assembly.  To achieve the level of fire and blast resistance needed, SAFTI FIRST provided SuperLite II-XL 120 with Heat Strengthened Laminated Glass that met the Performance 2 criteria.  It was supplied with the GPX Blast Framing System with a custom designed anchoring system.  SAFTI FIRST worked with the design team and blast consultant to ensure that the entire assembly worked with the surrounding structure to meet the required blast performance.

For the fire and ballistic rated system, SAFTI FIRST provided SuperLite II-XL 120 with Level 4 Ballistic Glazing.  Some of these panels included an obscure spandrel for areas that needed additional privacy.  It was supplied with the GPX Ballistic Framing System to ensure that the entire assembly was compliant. 

 

 

Since maximum transparency and vision were important design requirements, all the SuperLite II-XL fire resistive blast and fire resistive ballistic glazed assemblies utilized Starphire Low-Iron glass for an ultra-clear appearance despite the robust glass make-up.  The GPX Blast and GPX Ballistic Framing systems matched the clean, sharp sightlines and finish of the non-rated systems for a uniform look. Both framing systems were supplied pre-welded and pre-assembled in sections for ease of installation. 

The building also benefited from SuperLite II-XL 120’s large clear view areas, with individual panels just under 4,876 sq. inches, which is SuperLite II-XL 120’s maximum clear view area and the largest available at that time (SAFTI FIRST’s SuperLite II-XLB product currently has a largest clear view area at 7,980 square inches).

SAFTI FIRST also provided the large, 10-foot, 90 minute fire resistive pair doors in the glazed assembly.  They were supplied with custom hardware that was compatible with the specified card reader to ensure secure access to the building. 

The result is a beautiful and elegant glass wall and entrance system that greets building occupants as they enter and leave the facility during work hours, and would protect them from fire, blast or ballistic threats should it occur.

References:

Eve Hinman, P.E. “Blast Safety of the Building Envelope,” Whole Building Design Guide, (October 19, 2011).

Joseph L. Smith, P.S.P. and Nancy A. Renfroe, P.S.P., “Glazing Hazard Mitigation,” Whole Building Design Guide (July 23, 2010).

 

 

Related Stories

Government Buildings | Mar 24, 2023

19 federal buildings named GSA Design Awards winners

After a six-year hiatus, the U.S. General Services Administration late last year resumed its esteemed GSA Design Awards program. In all, 19 federal building projects nationwide were honored with 2022 GSA Design Awards, eight with Honor Awards and 11 with Citations.

Industry Research | Mar 2, 2023

Watch: Findings from Gensler's latest workplace survey of 2,000 office workers

Gensler's Janet Pogue McLaurin discusses the findings in the firm's 2022 Workplace Survey, based on responses from more than 2,000 workers in 10 industry sectors. 

Airports | Feb 28, 2023

Data visualization: $1 billion earmarked for 2023 airport construction projects

Ninety-nine airports across 47 states and two territories are set to share nearly $1 billion in funding in 2023 from the Federal Aviation Administration. The funding is aimed at help airports of all sizes meet growing air travel demand, with upgrades like larger security checkpoints and more reliable and faster baggage systems.

Multifamily Housing | Feb 16, 2023

Coastal Construction Group establishes an attainable multifamily housing division

Coastal Construction Group, one of the largest privately held construction companies in the Southeast, has announced a new division within their multifamily sector that will focus on the need for attainable housing in South Florida.

Giants 400 | Feb 9, 2023

New Giants 400 download: Get the complete at-a-glance 2022 Giants 400 rankings in Excel

See how your architecture, engineering, or construction firm stacks up against the nation's AEC Giants. For more than 45 years, the editors of Building Design+Construction have surveyed the largest AEC firms in the U.S./Canada to create the annual Giants 400 report. This year, a record 519 firms participated in the Giants 400 report. The final report includes 137 rankings across 25 building sectors and specialty categories.   

Codes and Standards | Feb 8, 2023

GSA releases draft of federal low embodied carbon material standards

The General Services Administration recently released a document that outlines standards for low embodied carbon materials and products to be used on federal construction projects.

Giants 400 | Feb 6, 2023

2022 Reconstruction Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. building reconstruction and renovation sector

Gensler, Stantec, IPS, Alfa Tech, STO Building Group, and Turner Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest reconstruction sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Feb 6, 2023

2022 Justice Facility Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. justice facility/public safety sector

Stantec, DLR Group, Turner Construction, STO Building Group, AECOM, and Dewberry top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms for justice facility/public safety buildings work, including correctional facilities, fire stations, jails, police stations, and prisons, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Steel Buildings | Feb 3, 2023

Top 10 structural steel building projects for 2023

A Mies van der Rohe-designed art and architecture school at Indiana University and Morphosis Architects' Orange County Museum of Art in Costa Mesa, Calif., are among 10 projects to win IDEAS² Awards from the American Institute of Steel Construction. 

Giants 400 | Jan 31, 2023

2022 Government Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. government buildings sector

Gensler, Jacobs, Hensel Phelps, and Page top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest government sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021