Project: Public Safety Facility in the East Coast
Architect: Skidmore Owings & Merrill
Glazing Contractor: W&W, LLC
Blast Consultant: Weidlinger Associates
Products: Fire Resistive/Blast Rated System with SuperLite II-XL 120 in GPX Blast Framing and Fire Resistive/Ballistic Rated System with SuperLite II-XL 120 in GPX Ballistic Framing.
A building’s design is very much influenced by the function it performs and the perceived threats that it may face – whether it’s from natural disasters, accidents or terrorist attacks – with the latter being a foremost concern for federal courthouses, embassies, government facilities and other high profile buildings. For these types of facilities, building materials are chosen based on their ability to mitigate or minimize the injuries and fatalities to occupants during an attack. Because of these security concerns, trade-offs have been made when it comes to daylighting, energy efficiency and aesthetics to name a few. The good news is that today, high-performance security glazing make-ups are available in the market place to meet the level of protection needed while continuing to provide natural light and a feeling of openness. These specialized systems can also blend with the surroundings seamlessly to enhance the building’s overall design.
The 1995 bombing of the A.P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City revealed the devastating effects of high velocity glass fragments on people in the building or those in the vicinity when a blast occurs. This prompted the General Services Administration (GSA) to establish a blast criteria for all glazing used in federal buildings, which was later on adopted by the Interagency Security Committee (ISC) to broaden its use. Part of its approach is to quantify glass failure not in terms of whether breakage occurs, but rather the hazard it causes to occupants. Today, the ISC Security Design Criteria Blast Protection Levels for Windows is the most widely recognized classification of design levels for glazing hazard protection:
|
Performance Condition |
Protection Level |
Hazard Level |
Description of Window Glazing Response |
|
1 |
Safe |
None |
Glazing does not break. No visible damage to glazing or frame. |
|
2 |
Very High |
None |
Glazing cracks but is retained by the frame. Dusting or very small fragments near the sill or floor acceptable. |
|
3a |
High |
Very Low |
Glazing cracks. Fragments enter space and land on floor no further than 3.3 ft. from the window. |
|
3b |
High |
Low |
Glazing cracks. Fragments enter space and land on floor no further than 10 ft. from the window. |
|
4 |
Medium |
Medium |
Glazing cracks. Fragments enter space and land on floor and impact a vertical witness panel at a distance of no more than 10 ft. from the window at a height no greater than 2 ft. above the floor. |
|
5 |
Low |
High |
Glazing cracks and window system fails catastrophically. Fragments enter space and land on floor and impact a vertical witness panel at a distance of no more than 10 ft. from the window at a height greater than 2 ft. above the floor. |
But what happens when the same blast rated glazing system must also meet 2-hour fire resistive requirements, as well as deliver maximum transparency and seamlessly blend with the existing non-rated systems?
Such was the case with a public safety facility located in the east coast of the United States. The glass wall between the secure entrance and main lobby had to meet both ASTM E-119/NFPA 251 for 2 hours with hose stream as well as Performance Condition 2 of the ISC Security Design Criteria Blast Protection Levels for Windows. Additionally, the assembly had to meet the requirements in UFC 3-340-02, Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions, UFC 4-020-01, Department of Defense Security Engineering Facilities Planning Manual and UFC 4-010-01, Department of Defense Minimum Anti-Terrorism Standards for Buildings. There was also an adjacent glass wall by the security officer’s desk that had to meet ASTM E-119/NFPA 251 for 2 hours and UL 752 Level 4 Ballistic.
Given the strict requirements of this project, SAFTI FIRST submitted a certified blast engineering report to the building team for the fire resistive, blast rated system, as well as provide a visual mock-up of the assembly. To achieve the level of fire and blast resistance needed, SAFTI FIRST provided SuperLite II-XL 120 with Heat Strengthened Laminated Glass that met the Performance 2 criteria. It was supplied with the GPX Blast Framing System with a custom designed anchoring system. SAFTI FIRST worked with the design team and blast consultant to ensure that the entire assembly worked with the surrounding structure to meet the required blast performance.
For the fire and ballistic rated system, SAFTI FIRST provided SuperLite II-XL 120 with Level 4 Ballistic Glazing. Some of these panels included an obscure spandrel for areas that needed additional privacy. It was supplied with the GPX Ballistic Framing System to ensure that the entire assembly was compliant.
Since maximum transparency and vision were important design requirements, all the SuperLite II-XL fire resistive blast and fire resistive ballistic glazed assemblies utilized Starphire Low-Iron glass for an ultra-clear appearance despite the robust glass make-up. The GPX Blast and GPX Ballistic Framing systems matched the clean, sharp sightlines and finish of the non-rated systems for a uniform look. Both framing systems were supplied pre-welded and pre-assembled in sections for ease of installation.
The building also benefited from SuperLite II-XL 120’s large clear view areas, with individual panels just under 4,876 sq. inches, which is SuperLite II-XL 120’s maximum clear view area and the largest available at that time (SAFTI FIRST’s SuperLite II-XLB product currently has a largest clear view area at 7,980 square inches).
SAFTI FIRST also provided the large, 10-foot, 90 minute fire resistive pair doors in the glazed assembly. They were supplied with custom hardware that was compatible with the specified card reader to ensure secure access to the building.
The result is a beautiful and elegant glass wall and entrance system that greets building occupants as they enter and leave the facility during work hours, and would protect them from fire, blast or ballistic threats should it occur.
References:
Eve Hinman, P.E. “Blast Safety of the Building Envelope,” Whole Building Design Guide, (October 19, 2011).
Joseph L. Smith, P.S.P. and Nancy A. Renfroe, P.S.P., “Glazing Hazard Mitigation,” Whole Building Design Guide (July 23, 2010).
Related Stories
Sponsored | | Jul 7, 2014
Channel glass illuminates science at the University of San Francisco
The University of San Francisco’s new John Lo Schiavo Center for Science and Innovation brings science to the forefront of academic life. Its glossy, three-story exterior invites students into the facility, and then flows sleekly down into the hillside where below-grade laboratories and classrooms make efficient use of space on the landlocked campus.
Sponsored | | Jun 27, 2014
SAFTI FIRST Now Offers GPX Framing with Sunshade Connectors
For the Doolittle Maintenance Facility, SAFTI FIRST provided 60 minute, fire resistive wall openings in the exterior using SuperLite II-XL 60 insulated with low-e glazing in GPX Framing with a clear anodized finish.
| May 28, 2014
KPF's dual towers in Turkey will incorporate motifs, symbols of Ottoman Empire
The two-building headquarters for Turkey’s largest and oldest financial institution, Ziraat Bank, is inspired by the country’s cultural heritage.
| May 27, 2014
Fire Rated Glass contributes to open lab environment at JSNN
Openness and transparency were high priorities in the design of the Joint School of Nanoscience & Nanoengineering within the Gateway University Research Park in Greensboro, N.C. Because the facility’s nanobioelectronics clean room houses potentially explosive materials, it needed to be able to contain flames, heat, and smoke in the event of a fire. SPONSORED CONTENT
| May 20, 2014
Kinetic Architecture: New book explores innovations in active façades
The book, co-authored by Arup's Russell Fortmeyer, illustrates the various ways architects, consultants, and engineers approach energy and comfort by manipulating air, water, and light through the layers of passive and active building envelope systems.
| May 5, 2014
Tragic wired glass injury makes headlines yet again
In the story, a high school student pushed open a hallway door glazed with wired glass. His arm not only broke the glass, but penetrated it, causing severe injuries. SPONSORED CONTENT
Sponsored | | May 3, 2014
Fire-rated glass floor system captures light in science and engineering infill
In implementing Northwestern University’s Engineering Life Sciences infill design, Flad Architects faced the challenge of ensuring adequate, balanced light given the adjacent, existing building wings. To allow for light penetration from the fifth floor to the ground floor, the design team desired a large, central atrium. One potential setback with drawing light through the atrium was meeting fire and life safety codes.
| Apr 25, 2014
Recent NFPA 80 updates clarify fire rated applications
Code confusion has led to misapplications of fire rated glass and framing, which can have dangerous and/or expensive results. Two recent NFPA 80 revisions help clarify the confusion. SPONSORED CONTENT
Sponsored | | Apr 23, 2014
Ridgewood High satisfies privacy, daylight and code requirements with fire rated glass
For a recent renovation of a stairwell and exit corridors at Ridgewood High School in Norridge, Ill., the design team specified SuperLite II-XL 60 in GPX Framing for its optical clarity, storefront-like appearance, and high STC ratings.
| Apr 8, 2014
Fire resistive curtain wall helps The Kensington meet property line requirements
The majority of fire rated glazing applications occur inside a building to allow occupants to exit the building safely or provide an area of refuge during a fire. But what happens when the threat of fire comes from the outside? This was the case for The Kensington, a mixed-use residential building in Boston.
