flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Feds publish framework for evaluating public-private partnerships

Codes and Standards

Feds publish framework for evaluating public-private partnerships

No single factor determines whether a project yields stronger benefit as a P3.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 17, 2016
Feds publish framework for evaluating public-private partnerships

A 371,160-sf office building in Frankfort, Ky., is being constructed through a public-private-partnership. Photo: Steve Beshear/Creative Commons.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury recently published an Economic Framework for Comparing Public-Private Partnerships and Conventional Procurement. 

The department concluded that there is no single factor that should determine whether a P3 is likely to yield a stronger benefit than one delivered through conventional means. The paper also outlines important steps for a government to take before procuring a P3 project to ensure optimal benefit to the taxpayer.

One key factor cited in the report was the capacity of a project to bundle several projects into one large contract. The capacity to bundle is by far the most important factor in a P3 creating cost savings, the report concluded.

Other important considerations were:

  • Private-sector expertise: A strong indicator of whether the project will provide a net-benefit over the full life cycle of a P3 is the technical expertise available.
  • Clearly defined terms that are quantifiable: How precisely does the contract lay out the service level required? 
  • High capital costs and long lived assets: Assets procured using a P3 need to be large enough to generate cost savings that offset the transaction costs of privately raised capital.

Related Stories

| Nov 16, 2012

South Dakota prefers LEED over building code on state projects

“(LEED is) much better than a mandatory building code because you get a little wiggle room in these projects,” said Mike Mueller, a spokesman for the South Dakota Bureau of Administration.

| Nov 16, 2012

AAMA publishes quality assurance guidelines for Polyamide Thermal Barriers

The American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA) has published QAG-2-12, Voluntary Quality Assurance Processing Guide for Polyamide Thermal Barriers.

| Nov 16, 2012

New ANSI/BIFMA standards developed for educational seating

The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) has approved the newly developed safety and performance standard for educational seating: ANSI/BIFMA X6.1-2012—the first of its kind.

| Nov 16, 2012

Green building councils in 62 countries expect 60% of their work to be green by 2015

More than half of the respondents to a survey of members of the Green Building Council in 62 countries expect green projects to comprise 60% of their work by 2015.

| Nov 16, 2012

Voters approve fewer construction ballot measures in 2012 than in 2008

Voters passed fewer ballot measures related to construction projects this year than they did in 2008, according to an analysis by the Associated General Contractors of America.

| Nov 9, 2012

New ANSI/BIFMA standard adds point for lower formaldehyde emissions

The ANSI/BIFMA e3-2012 Furniture Sustainability Standard now includes an additional point for furniture products that meet a new, lower formaldehyde emissions limit.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021