flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Federally-backed rebuilding of public buildings often leaves them vulnerable to future storms

Codes and Standards

Federally-backed rebuilding of public buildings often leaves them vulnerable to future storms

FEMA dollars pay for reconstruction, but local decision-makers ignore climate change impacts.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | October 18, 2018

Analysis of federal data by the New York Times found that FEMA’s public assistance program has paid for many rebuild-in-place projects that leave the structures just as defenseless against future storms.

One example is the Plaquemines Parish Detention Center, a new $105 million jail, in Louisiana that was destroyed by Hurricane Katrina. Although the building now hovers 19 feet above a marsh perched atop concrete pillars, it must be evacuated before any major storm because it was rebuilt on flood-prone land that could become essentially an island after a flood.

Rather than relocate damaged structures to higher ground, local officials often choose to replicate the past, ignoring new climate realities, theTimes report says. The federal government has actually taken steps back from requirements that could prompt rebuilding projects to beef up resiliency.

President Trump last year rescinded an executive order signed by President Barack Obama that required consideration of climate science in the design of federally funded projects. That could have forced some buildings to be elevated higher. In March, FEMA released a four-year strategic plan that removed previous mentions of climate change and sea-level rise.

Related Stories

| Sep 1, 2011

Project Aims to Automate Code Compliance Assessment

FIATECH, a consortium of owners from the industrial, power, and retail markets that build large structures, launched a project this year to validate the use of automation technology for code compliance assessment, and to accelerate the regulatory approval process using building models. Long-term objectives include the development of an extensive, open-source rule set library that is approved by industry and regulatory bodies for use by technology developers and code officials.

| Sep 1, 2011

EPA Says Additional Lead Paint Cleaning Rules Not Necessary

The EPA has concluded that current Lead: Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program (LRRP) cleaning requirements and lead-safe work regulations are sufficient to protect the public from lead dust hazards. “Our members have been instrumental in contacting legislators to detail the detrimental impact of the current LRRP," says Richard Walker, American Architectural Manufacturers Association’s president and CEO. “This collective industry voice has prompted the EPA to make the responsible decision to refrain from adding further, unnecessary costs to homeowners under the current economic climate."http://www.aamanet.org/news/1/10/0/all/603/aama-commends-its-members-congress-for-vacating-lrrp-clearance-rule

| Aug 11, 2010

Best AEC Firms of 2011/12

Later this year, we will launch Best AEC Firms 2012. We’re looking for firms that create truly positive workplaces for their AEC professionals and support staff. Keep an eye on this page for entry information. +

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021