flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Fannie Mae green bonds program could be greenwashing

Codes and Standards

Fannie Mae green bonds program could be greenwashing

Analysis shows significant number of green bond properties become less efficient.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | August 18, 2021
Green leaves

Courtesy Pixabay

Fannie Mae’s green bond program to spur efficiency upgrades may be falling far short of its goals, according to analysis by Grist.

A Grist report says that about 1,600 of the 3,800 properties that had loans packaged into “green” mortgage-backed securities saw improvement in their energy scores within a median period of about two years. But more than 800 properties that the online publication examined saw lower or identical energy scores in the most recent data year compared to their scores at loan issuance.

“Whether or not Fannie Mae’s green bonds program is driving significant decarbonization and efficiency improvements is very much an open question,” Grist says. “The value of the program is unclear even in cases where energy savings did improve: About a fifth of the buildings enrolled from 2016 through 2019 performed worse than the median U.S. building even after fulfilling program requirements.”

Another criticism: Participation is highest in states and cities that already have stringent building energy efficiency codes. That means some of these building owners may have pursued green improvements without Fannie Mae’s incentives.

Related Stories

| Sep 1, 2011

Project Aims to Automate Code Compliance Assessment

FIATECH, a consortium of owners from the industrial, power, and retail markets that build large structures, launched a project this year to validate the use of automation technology for code compliance assessment, and to accelerate the regulatory approval process using building models. Long-term objectives include the development of an extensive, open-source rule set library that is approved by industry and regulatory bodies for use by technology developers and code officials.

| Sep 1, 2011

EPA Says Additional Lead Paint Cleaning Rules Not Necessary

The EPA has concluded that current Lead: Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program (LRRP) cleaning requirements and lead-safe work regulations are sufficient to protect the public from lead dust hazards. “Our members have been instrumental in contacting legislators to detail the detrimental impact of the current LRRP," says Richard Walker, American Architectural Manufacturers Association’s president and CEO. “This collective industry voice has prompted the EPA to make the responsible decision to refrain from adding further, unnecessary costs to homeowners under the current economic climate."http://www.aamanet.org/news/1/10/0/all/603/aama-commends-its-members-congress-for-vacating-lrrp-clearance-rule

| Aug 11, 2010

Best AEC Firms of 2011/12

Later this year, we will launch Best AEC Firms 2012. We’re looking for firms that create truly positive workplaces for their AEC professionals and support staff. Keep an eye on this page for entry information. +

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021

Â