flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Failed landmark preservation effort in Chicago provides lessons for planners

Codes and Standards

Failed landmark preservation effort in Chicago provides lessons for planners

Gentrification fears heightened among Pilsen neighborhood residents doomed ambitious preservation plan.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 19, 2021

Courtesy Pixabay

A plan to preserve one of Chicago’s most rapidly gentrifying neighborhoods ended in failure when it could not generate community support.

The Pilsen neighborhood, home to Eastern European immigrants in the 19th century and later to newcomers from Mexico, includes ornate “Bohemian Baroque” buildings with brilliant murals expressing the area’s Mexican heritage. The city proposed establishing a historic district to protect more than 850 buildings in Pilsen, but was not able to assuage concerns from neighborhood residents.

The historic district was a part of a larger preservation strategy that included housing supports, economic development measures, park space, and more. Other than some financial support, though, the other measures stalled, prompting suspicion in the neighborhood.

Residents strongly opposed the strategy, fearing that landmarking would not provide relief from displacement and gentrification. Part of the problem: design guidelines on how historic building elements had to be maintained according to the district’s standards were never completed and the city could not present a good estimation on the costs of building repairs nor on the value of incentives that would be available to make repairs.

An important lesson for preservationists is the need to partner with more community development organizations, social justice organizations, housing developers, and planners.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Apr 3, 2017

New standard test method for static loading and impact on exterior shading released

The method provides a standard lab procedure evaluation of ice and snow loads and impacts.

Codes and Standards | Mar 30, 2017

WELL enters strategic partnership with developer of standards and assessment tools

GIGA’s RESET standard and data collection will be integrated into the WELL standard.

Codes and Standards | Mar 29, 2017

Climate-specific code changes target energy savings for tropical zones

Hawaii considers updated 2015 IECC tailored to its climate.

Codes and Standards | Mar 28, 2017

Safety concerns over wood-frame construction raised after Raleigh apartment fire

The unfinished building was destroyed in a five-alarm blaze.

Codes and Standards | Mar 27, 2017

Bills in Maryland Legislature would restrict use of wood in multifamily construction

American Wood Council and design and construction professionals are speaking out against the measure.

Codes and Standards | Mar 23, 2017

New manual of IT connectivity guidelines for commercial developments, redevelopments released

Mobile capacity planning, conduit points of entry, and electrical resiliency are covered.

Codes and Standards | Mar 22, 2017

Brick Industry Assn. study finds brick buildings cost less than precast, metal, and glass

The study compares costs in five categories of construction.

Codes and Standards | Mar 21, 2017

Calif. shopping center is first to earn BREEAM USA In-Use certification

The certification measures and monitors environmental performance of existing buildings.

Codes and Standards | Mar 20, 2017

Professional liability insurance rates for architects and engineers expected to be stable in 2017

Premiums leveled off in 2015, and claims have been stable, helping to hold costs down.

Codes and Standards | Mar 15, 2017

Energy Star program at risk

The standard-setting initiative for energy-efficient products may be a victim of Trump budget cuts.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021