flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Engineering firms KJWW and TTG merge

Engineers

Engineering firms KJWW and TTG merge

Comparable in size and compatible in culture, the companies unite to present clients with greater “scale.” 


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | October 6, 2015
Engineering firms KJWW and TTG merge

Logos courtesy KJWW

Two of the nonresidential building industry’s leading engineering firms have joined forces to leverage their similar sizes and market strategies.

KJWW Engineering, based in Rock Island, Ill., and TTG Engineers, based in Pasadena, Calif., will continue to operate under their own banners, but within a newly created holding company with common management.

Ranked 11th and 14th, respectively, on BD+C’s 2014 Engineering Giants list, the firms’ combined revenues last year would have elevated them to No. 4.

The merger unites two companies with a combined 860 employees working in 25 national and five international locations. “The merger gives TTG and KJWW a larger presence throughout the U.S. and strengthens our collective dominance in the healthcare, higher education, government, entertainment, industrial, and transportation markets,” said Zareh Astrouian, PE, SE, president of TTG. Paul VanDuyne, PE, KJWW’s president, added that the merger “allows us to build on those strengths with greater geographic mobility.”

In an interview with BD+C, VanDuyne—who will be CEO of the holding company, with Astrouian its chairman— said the two firms would spend the next 15 months integrating their operational infrastructure, such as accounting, IT, etc. Over that period, the companies will keep their engineering teams intact, while integrating similar practices. VanDuyne was quick to note that the merger is not a prelude to staff reductions. “Human capital is at such a premium right now, and we would be very happy to go through this process without losing a single person.”

VanDuyne believed this merger would allow both companies to serve national end-user clients more effectively. TTG should gain from KJWW’s strengths in such areas as medical equipment planning and architectural lighting, while KJWW should benefit from TTG’s expertise in the entertainment sector. “We feel this is a great opportunity to take a look at a brand new organization. That’s a little bit extraordinary for two $50 million companies,” he said.

The firms’ executives have been discussing this merger for about a year, said VanDuyne. “It started with a phone call about getting together. We met at [KJWW’s] offices in Chicago, and it went on from there.”

KJWW and TTG announced their merger less than a month after Thornton Tomasetti merged with Weidlinger Associates. While VanDuyne didn’t think these events necessarily presaged more consolidation among engineering companies, he did note that “scale” is becoming more important for firms to be relevant to clients in such areas as BIM and sustainability.

It hasn’t been determined whether the firms would eventually operate out of a single headquarters. That seems unlikely, at least in the near future, especially when Van Duyne said “I don’t think this is the last time you’re going to hear from us about expanding across the country.”

Tags

Related Stories

| Aug 8, 2013

Energy research animates science sector [2013 Giants 300 Report]

After an era of biology-oriented spending—largely driven by Big Pharma and government concerns about bioterrorism—climate change is reshaping priorities in science and technology construction.

| Aug 8, 2013

Top Science and Technology Sector Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Affiliated Engineers, Middough, URS top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest science and technology sector engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.

| Aug 8, 2013

Top Science and Technology Sector Architecture Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

HDR, Perkins+Will, HOK top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest science and technology sector architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S.

| Aug 8, 2013

Top Science and Technology Sector Construction Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Skanska, DPR, Suffolk top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest science and technology sector contractors and construction management firms in the U.S.

| Aug 8, 2013

Level of Development: Will a new standard bring clarity to BIM model detail?

The newly released LOD Specification document allows Building Teams to understand exactly what’s in the BIM model they’re being handed.

| Aug 8, 2013

Blueprint for a boom town: Potential pitfalls for booming development

Accolades for Nashville, Tenn., my hometown and GS&P’s flagship location, just keep piling up. In 2011, Forbes named Nashville No. 3 on their list of “The Next Big Boom Towns in the U.S." All of these accolades are wonderful, but Nashville now must work hard to prove their longevity—to grow and build intelligently.

| Aug 8, 2013

Does billing by the hour still make sense?

What’s an idea really worth? That’s the question posed by The New York Times in a provocative article that explores whether the notion of billing time still makes economic sense. 

| Aug 8, 2013

Vertegy spins off to form independent green consultancy

St. Louis-based Vertegy has announced the formation of Vertegy, LLC, transitioning into an independent company separate from the Alberici Enterprise. The new company was officially unveiled Aug. 1, 2013

| Aug 6, 2013

CoreNet: Office space per worker shrinks to 150 sf

The average amount of space per office worker globally has dropped to 150 square feet or less, from 225 square feet in 2010, according to a recent global survey conducted by CoreNet Global.

| Aug 6, 2013

Australia’s first net zero office building features distinctive pixelated façade

Australia's first carbon neutral office building, featuring a distinctive pixelated façade, recently opened in Melbourne.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021