flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Energy efficiency as a service gaining ground as financing approach for adopting innovations

Codes and Standards

Energy efficiency as a service gaining ground as financing approach for adopting innovations

Building owners can invest in new technology with no upfront cost.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | December 17, 2020

Courtesy Pixabay

In recent years, innovations in energy efficiency technology has opened many new avenues to reduce electric consumption in buildings.

But it is hard for building owners to keep up with these developments, analyze which options are most cost effective, and decide how best to invest their money. An increasingly popular method to implement energy efficiency technology is called “energy efficiency as a service.”

A typical arrangement consists of a building owner and a provider striking an agreement that pays for energy efficiency projects. The building owner does not pay anything upfront. The owner makes payments in installments within a certain timeframe. Payments are in the form of savings in energy costs realized from the improvements.

Bentley Mills, a manufacturer of commercial carpet products, employed this technique to fund a $1.5 million energy efficiency project. The contract stated that over the course of the 8-year term, Bentley would save over 12.8 million kWh. One year after the project was completed, the plant measured a 21% decrease in the kWh per square yard manufactured while increasing sales growth by 9% during the same time.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jun 25, 2018

Integrated Project Delivery guide offered by Pankow Foundation

An Action Guide for Leaders offers answers to critical IPD questions.

Codes and Standards | Jun 21, 2018

New app said to automate code compliance

Startup offers plug-in that scans 3D models.

Codes and Standards | Jun 20, 2018

Home values and local tax revenues at risk from high tide flooding, scientists group says

Analysis of property data identifies communities prone to frequent flooding.

Codes and Standards | Jun 19, 2018

Structural engineered wood products exempt from new EPA formaldehyde ruling

Exempt products include structural plywood, oriented strand board (OSB).

Codes and Standards | Jun 18, 2018

Seattle City Council repeals controversial new per-worker tax on large employers

Measure was aimed at raising $50 million for homeless services, affordable housing.

Codes and Standards | Jun 14, 2018

Hardscape from development makes ‘1,000-year’ flood in Maryland worse

Impermeable concrete made it easier for water to overwhelm drainage system.

Codes and Standards | Jun 13, 2018

United States Resiliency Council announces support for Calif. earthquake resiliency bill

Measure would help cities identify structures that could fail in major quake.

Codes and Standards | Jun 12, 2018

Congestion pricing for cars is effective in reducing traffic, but a difficult sell

After three years, traffic congestion declined by 30% in London.

Codes and Standards | Jun 11, 2018

First RFP requiring modular construction on New York City housing project issued

Part of Housing 2.0 modular construction initiative.

Codes and Standards | Jun 6, 2018

Buffalo, N.Y., contractor exec pleads guilty to fraud for bid rigging on $750 million contract

LPCiminelli stops functioning as GC in fallout from the case.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category



Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.


halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021