flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Early-stage procurement: The next evolution of the construction supply chain

Building Materials

Early-stage procurement: The next evolution of the construction supply chain

Austin Commercial’s Jason Earnhardt explains why supply chain issues for the construction industry are not going to go away and how developers and owners can get ahead of project roadblocks.


By Jason Earnhardt, Supply Chain Manager, Austin Commercial | June 20, 2022
Early-stage procurement: The next evolution of the construction supply chain
Photo: Pixabay

Anyone who has taken even a passing glance at the news over the last year has become acutely aware of the supply chain. Empty grocery store shelves may be the first image that springs to mind, but when it comes to the construction industry, the discussion is a little more nuanced.

First, let’s define our terms. The true supply chain is material tracking from cradle to grave. It is an entire system designed to identify a need, acquire the need, and deliver the need. In the just-in-time (JIT) model used by companies from Walmart to Dell to the biggest names in construction, the system has minimal lag time and little room for inefficiency.

In a consumer-facing JIT inventory system, say for computers, a company would have just enough parts on hand to fulfill the current need. Customers order, the company puts together the product and ships it out. The system ideally works together in perfect harmony. Until it doesn't. Just one hitch in the system, let alone several, and the entire ecosystem falls apart. 

In construction, JIT has been the modus operandi for decades. The material is delivered to site as and when it is needed. This model does have a number of benefits of course—lower required cashflow upfront and a limited need for storage and security. But, as we saw starting in March of 2020, unforeseen events can have a catastrophic ripple effect on a JIT model. 

As widely used as JIT has been, it has never been truly efficient. There are hundreds of moving parts and risk baked into the calculus. The model didn’t need to account for extreme employment variables, local policy restricting movement and workforce, increased costs associated with delays, shortages and fluctuating commodities. In the old model, LEAN upgrades helped to tighten up the system, but was never intended to account for all of these global variables.

As we see it here at Austin, the last two years have given us the opportunity to reinvent how construction works, how we can own the process of supply chain, and how we can pass on what we’ve learned to our clients.

A Supply Chain House of Cards

The disruption to the construction supply chain has gone far beyond just difficulty obtaining materials. Frozen finances, limited workforce and shortened workforce weeks have all stopped projects in their tracks. And that’s just on-site—on the manufacturing side, staff shortages and difficulties sourcing raw material are compounding the challenges for projects across the country. 

The truth is that supply chain problems will likely get much worse if the entire system doesn’t change. COVID may have been the reason that we put a magnifying glass on the inefficiencies and risk inherent to the JIT model, but the system was always very fragile. Now that we see it can come down as quickly as a house of cards, it’s time for a new way of managing the construction supply chain. A holistic view that combines logistics, risk mitigation and a new procurement process all tied together with analytics.

A New Way Forward for the Construction Supply Chain

In the traditional model, supply chain issues would often trickle down to the sub-contractors. GCs, subs and trades would procure parts from a local supplier and, more often than not, the owner wouldn’t know or care, as long as the project was getting done. That is simply is not a viable workflow any longer as local part suppliers are rarely an option and cash flow is a real issue for even medium-sized GCs. 

So how are we fixing this? How are we continuing to get projects done in this climate? We are customizing our project management process for each client but, in general, we are using a number of tools and risk-mitigation strategies and looking at the supply chain in a holistic way.

The biggest weapon in our arsenal at the moment is early-stage procurement. We are going out at the beginning of a project and instead of making purchases for each phase, we are getting all the materials for the project on site and storing it. We get our hands on all the materials, we stock it, we store it and protect it on campus for as long as necessary. We are procuring extra equipment for material storage like forklifts and box trailers and adding resources to get everything moved around and in the right place. On one of our largest projects, we have essentially created our own “microport” with highly detailed and trackable logistics to keep everything running smoothly and on time. 

It takes experience and expertise to make this all work efficiently, but the new model gives us price protection in a volatile marketplace. It gives us the peace of mind of accounting for everything we need ahead of time. And it gives us more control in an increasingly uncertain world.

New Roadblocks to a New Process

Clearly, revolutionizing a model that has been in place for decades won’t come without snags. With that said, none of the challenges we’ve faced so far have been insurmountable. But they do require our clients to look at the supply chain in a new way. For instance, upfront procurement requires different financing and more funding at the beginning.

And of course, the biggest and most fundamental challenge of all: cash flow. Yes, this way of handling the supply chain costs money in exchange for on-time project delivery. On pre-pandemic contracts, none of these costs were accounted for. In private deals, GCs are issuing change orders and for municipal contracts, we’re starting to see more COVID-specific funds coming into play.

Regardless of these potential roadblocks, logistics and researching manufacturers has become a hallmark of our risk mitigation strategy for our clients and for ourselves. We have essentially become our own in-house logistics company, all in the name of keeping our clients’ projects on track.

In the long-run, it won’t just be Austin thinking this way--supply chain analysis and mastery is going to become a top-of-mind concern for everyone in the industry from owners to trades, as well as a crucial component in getting large-scale projects done on time well into the future.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jason Earnhardt is a Supply Chain Manager for Austin Commercial. Combining a background in finance, analysis and construction, he has revolutionized how our clients look at risk mitigation, logistics and supply chain management.

Related Stories

Coronavirus | Apr 5, 2020

COVID-19: Most multifamily contractors experiencing delays in projects due to coronavirus pandemic

The NMHC Construction Survey is intended to gauge the magnitude of the disruption caused by the COVID-19 outbreak on multifamily construction.

Building Materials | Mar 3, 2020

84 Lumber President Maggie Hardy Knox receives Career Achievement Award

Maggie Hardy Knox, President of 84 Lumber and Nemacolin Woodlands Resort, to receive Career Achievement Award.

75 Top Building Products | Dec 16, 2019

Top Window and Door Products for 2019

Pella’s Rolscreen retractable screen and NanaWall’s HSW single-track sliding glass wall are among the 16 window and door products to make Building Design+Construction’s 2019 101 Top Products report.

75 Top Building Products | Dec 16, 2019

Top Structural Products for 2019

Inpro’s Fireline 140 fire barrier and Owens Corning’s Foamglas cellular glass insulation are among the 10 structural products to make Building Design+Construction's 2019 101 Top Products report.

75 Top Building Products | Dec 16, 2019

101 Top Products for 2019

Building Design+Construction readers and editors select their top building products for the past 12 months in the fourth-annual 101 Top Products report.

75 Top Building Products | Dec 16, 2019

Top Interior Building Products for 2019

Arktura's Delta Drop ceiling and CertainTeed's Decoustics Rondolo wood panels are among the 13 new interior products to make Building Design+Construction's 2019 101 Top Products report. 

75 Top Building Products | Dec 16, 2019

Top Glass and Glazing Products for 2019

SageGlass's Harmony dynamic glass and Vitro Architectural Glass's Acuity low-iron glass are among the nine new glass and glazing products to make Building Design+Construction's 2019 101 Top Products report.

75 Top Building Products | Dec 16, 2019

Top Flooring Products for 2019

Tarkett’s aviation-inspired flooring collection and J+J Flooring’s textile composite flooring are among the four new commercial flooring products to make Building Design+Construction’​s 2019 101 Top Products report. 

75 Top Building Products | Dec 12, 2019

Top Building Envelope Products for 2019

Sto's beetle-inspired exterior coating and Dörken Systems' UV-resistant vapor-permeable barrier are among the 28 new building envelope products to make Building Design+Construction's 2019 101 Top Products report. 

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category


Codes and Standards

Updated document details methods of testing fenestration for exterior walls

The Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance (FGIA) updated a document serving a recommended practice for determining test methodology for laboratory and field testing of exterior wall systems. The document pertains to products covered by an AAMA standard such as curtain walls, storefronts, window walls, and sloped glazing. AAMA 501-24, Methods of Test for Exterior Walls was last updated in 2015. 



halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021