“It is the first time that a number of 100-plus-year-old construction firms are waking up in a cold sweat and saying, ‘We might get Uber’d.’ Instead of innovating to improve productivity, there is a sense of urgency and need to innovate to survive, let alone thrive.” — Darren Bechtel, Founder, Managing Director, Brick & Mortar Ventures (as told to BuiltWorlds)
“One of the biggest risks today is not leveraging technology, or refusing to be an early adopter of the ‘next big thing.’ There will be major technological disrupters in this market, and the company that’s slow to pick up on them is essentially diminishing its position in a very competitive industry.” — Patrick O’Connor, Vice President of Risk Management and Counsel, The Walsh Group (as told to FMI Corp.)
Declarations like these are not hyperbole, nor are they specific to the AEC industry. Leaders in almost all business sectors—if they are half-way competent—operate their organizations with a sense of angst and a healthy dose of paranoia, preparing for what’s around the corner.
Well, there is plenty around the corner these days, and AEC firms are scrambling to adjust to the coming “new normal” of commercial design and construction.
Are we ready for technological disruption? What tools and processes can we employ to gain efficiencies and eliminate waste? Who are our future leaders? What skills are required for the next generation of practitioners? What are the short- and long-term needs of our clients, and their building assets? Is Google going to take our jobs? (No joke. I’ve heard this one more than once.)
These are among the litany of considerations that AEC firms must address to future-proof their organizations.
But while talk of the disruptive nature of technology and innovation captures the headlines, what’s really keeping the leaders of the nation’s largest general contractor and construction management firms up at night is people.
In a new survey by FMI Corp. of C-suite and risk management professionals at GC and CM firms, 80% of respondents identified a “limited supply of skilled craftworkers” as a top risk for 2019, and 44% cited a “limited supply of experienced field supervisors” as a primary concern. Exacerbating the talent shortage is the coming mass exodus of baby boomers as they reach retirement age.
In response, firms are placing priority on bringing craftworkers and design professionals in-house; strengthening training and development programs; and bolstering talent recruitment efforts by giving HR managers a seat at the executive table. Is it enough? That remains to be seen, but it’s a good start.
Download the free report at: tinyurl.com/FMIrisk19.
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Industrial Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. industrial buildings sector
Clayco, Jacobs, and Ware Malcomb top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest industrial buildings sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Convention Center Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. convention center sector
AECOM, Gensler, and Jacobs head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest convention center sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Reconstruction Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. building reconstruction and renovation sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest reconstruction sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 K-12 School Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. K-12 school facilities sector
AECOM, Gilbane, and PBK head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest K-12 school facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Sports Facilities Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. sports facilities sector
Kimley-Horn, Mortenson, and Populous top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest sports facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Office Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. office building sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest office building sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Hotel Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. hospitality sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and Suffolk Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest hotel sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Healthcare Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. healthcare facilities sector
HDR, Jacobs, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest healthcare facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Government Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. government buildings sector
HNTB, Jacobs, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest government sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Cultural Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. cultural facilities sector
AECOM, Arup, and Populous head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest cultural facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.