flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Disaster mitigation strategies that exceed code could save billions

Codes and Standards

Disaster mitigation strategies that exceed code could save billions

Four dollars saved for every dollar spent, says NIBS report.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 23, 2018

Specific disaster mitigation strategies that go beyond the requirements of the 2015 International Codes model building codes could save the nation billions of dollars, according to the National Institute of Building Sciences just issued Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves: 2017 Interim Report.

Investing in hazard mitigation measures to exceed select code requirements can save the nation $4 for every $1 spent, the report says. The report comes on the heels of the nation’s worst year of natural disasters in terms of cost. There were 16 events in 2017 with losses exceeding $1 billion, with total costs of about $306 billion, surpassing the record losses in 2005 by $100 billion.

Effective strategies to exceed minimum requirements of the 2015 I-Codes include:

– For flood resistance (to address riverine flooding and hurricane surge), building new homes higher than required by the 2015 International Building Code (IBC).

– For resistance to hurricane winds, building new homes to comply with the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS) FORTIFIED Home Hurricane standards.

– For resistance to earthquakes, building new buildings stronger and stiffer than required by the 2015 IBC.

– For fire resistance in the wildland-urban interface, building new buildings to comply with the 2015 International Wildland-Urban Interface Code (IWUIC).

NIBS notes that while mitigation represents an excellent investment, not everyone is willing or able to bear construction costs for more resilient buildings, even if the long-term benefits exceed the up-front costs. Programs to help finance mitigation projects should align incentives from finance, insurance, government and other stakeholders, NIBS says.

Related Stories

| Mar 8, 2012

Green buildings more resilient than conventionally built structures

A new study by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) and the University of Michigan’s Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning suggests that structures built to green standards can advance building resiliency.

| Mar 1, 2012

LEED Platinum standard likely to mean net-zero energy by 2018

As LEED standards continue to rise, the top level, LEED Platinum, will likely mean net-zero energy construction by 2018.

| Mar 1, 2012

EPA beefs up stormwater discharge rule from construction projects

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has now finalized its 2012 construction general permit (CGP) that authorizes stormwater discharges from construction projects that disturb one or more acres of land in the areas where EPA is the permitting authority.

| Mar 1, 2012

Regulators investigate structural failures during construction of two Ohio casinos

Regulators with the Occupational Safety & Health Administration and the city of Cincinnati are investigatingthe collapse of the second floor of Cincinnati's Horseshoe Casino as workers were pouring concrete.

| Mar 1, 2012

Is your project too small for LEED? Consider other green standards

There are many other recognized national, state and local programs that offer a variety of best management practices and sustainable design, construction and operating strategies.

| Mar 1, 2012

California bill aims to cut costs for commercial building energy retrofits

A bill in the California Assembly would allow the state to pool together property owners’ energy-retrofit loans.

| Feb 29, 2012

Carvalho appointed Shawmut Safety Director

He has been a driving force behind multiple safety-orientated initiatives at Shawmut, including Safety Week, the creation of an online safety manual, and the implementation of a new safety reporting and tracking system. 

| Feb 23, 2012

Federal budget cuts put major building projects on hold

A plan to build the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility in Kansas is among several major building projects in jeopardy after the Obama administration’s 2013 budget was unveiled. The budget would cut all construction spending for the facility.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021