Design-build delivered projects will account for nearly half of all construction spending by 2025, according to the consulting and investment firm FMI’s latest market research on design-built utilization.
FMI’s research for its 50-page report is based on a survey of 279 industry stakeholders and 46 interviews. FMI conducted the study in partnership with the Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA), and piggybacks on research in 2018 that confirmed design-build was no longer just an alternative delivery method, but one that had been embraced by a growing number of owner-developers and their AEC partners.
FMI’s latest report, which it releases today, forecasts that spending for design-build construction put in place will grow at a compound annual rate of 7.6% over the years 2021 through 2025, and hit $405.7 billion in 2025, or 47% of total construction spending that year, vs 42% of the total in 2021.
FMI expects the five-year rate of growth to be higher than the national average in the West South Central, South Atlantic, Middle Atlantic, and New England regions.
![Design-Build delivery is popular in the South and New England.](/sites/default/files/inline-images/D-B%20geography.png)
CERTAIN SECTORS MORE DISPOSED TOWARD DESIGN-BUILD
Over the forecast years, FMI estimates that the aggregate spending on projects delivered via design-build will be $1.732 trillion, or 46.2% of the $3.742 trillion spent on all construction projects. Highway and street projects will account for 16% of the design-build spending, followed by Education (15%), Manufacturing (13%) and Commercial and Office (12% each). Spending on design-build water/wastewater projects is expected to show the highest annual growth rate—11.1%—although that sector will represent only 5% of total design-build project spending over the forecast years.
![Education and Manufacturing are sectors that lend themselves to Design-Build project delivery.](/sites/default/files/inline-images/D-B%20by%20bldg%20type.png)
Design-build rated highest across all project delivery methods, with 77% of the report’s respondents having “very good” or “excellent” experiences with the method. The 2021 study found that 60% of respondents identified “owner goals and objectives” as an influence on their choice of delivery methods, following by 50% who identified a project’s complexity and innovation, and 46% who cited “delivery schedule” or “contractor experience.”
HIGH FAVORABILITY QUOTIENT
![Over past five years, Design-Build has increased market share.](/sites/default/files/inline-images/D-B%20by%20total.png)
Seventy-seven percent of the study’s respondents thought that the design-build delivery method would increase over the next five years. “We have seen significantly more design-build work,” stated one respondent quoted in the report. “Virtually everything in our geography is going design-build,” said another.
Conversely, respondents with less favorable experiences with design-build delivery noted that some owners still see this method as a way of transferring risk to the building team, and underestimate the commitment needed to make this delivery method work.
Most respondents, however, saw myriad benefits in design-build. For example, 76% of architects, designers, and engineers, and 89% of GCs and CMs, cited increased collaboration and creativity. Greater project and design control was cited by 88% of GCs/CMs and 84% of specialty trade contractors. GCs/CMs (who represented 31% of the study’s respondents) like the opportunities to innovate that design-build methods afford them, as do 90% of owner’s reps.
Nearly half—47%—of organizations that responded to FMI’s survey use fixed price/lump sum contracts for their design-build projects, compared to 39% that use guaranteed max price contracts.
Related Stories
Market Data | Feb 17, 2016
AIA reports slight contraction in Architecture Billings Index
Multifamily residential sector improving after sluggish 2015.
Market Data | Feb 11, 2016
AIA: Continued growth expected in nonresidential construction
The American Institute of Architects’ semi-annual Consensus Construction Forecast indicates a growth of 8% in construction spending in 2016, and 6.7% the following year.
Market Data | Feb 10, 2016
Nonresidential building starts and spending should see solid gains in 2016: Gilbane report
But finding skilled workers continues to be a problem and could inflate a project's costs.
Market Data | Feb 9, 2016
Cushman & Wakefield is bullish on U.S. economy and its property markets
Sees positive signs for construction and investment growth in warehouses, offices, and retail
Market Data | Feb 5, 2016
CMD/Oxford forecast: Nonresidential building growth will recover modestly in 2016
Increased government spending on infrastructure projects should help.
Market Data | Feb 4, 2016
Mortenson: Nonresidential construction costs expected to increase in six major metros
The Construction Cost Index, from Mortenson Construction, indicated rises between 3 and 4% on average.
Contractors | Feb 1, 2016
ABC: Tepid GDP growth a sign construction spending may sputter
Though the economy did not have a strong ending to 2015, the data does not suggest that nonresidential construction spending is set to decline.
Data Centers | Jan 28, 2016
Top 10 markets for data center construction
JLL’s latest outlook foresees a maturation in certain metros.
Market Data | Jan 20, 2016
Nonresidential building starts sag in 2015
CDM Research finds only a few positive signs among the leading sectors.
Market Data | Jan 20, 2016
Architecture Billings Index ends year on positive note
While volatility persists, architecture firms reported healthy performance for 2015.