flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Design-build delivery is setting new parameters for project management

Building Team

Design-build delivery is setting new parameters for project management

FMI paper provides clues to what makes these contracts click (or not).


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | January 4, 2019

Design-build, especially as part of P3 agreements, is steadily becoming the preferred contractual delivery method for nonresidential construction. Image: FMI

More owners and developers are latching onto design-build as a preferred delivery method for projects large and small. And a new paper from FMI, the construction management consultant and investment banking firm, outlines how AEC firms and their clients that enter into such contracts are avoiding stress points that often bog down construction.

Drawing on FMI’s “2018 Design-Build Utilization” report, “the paper, “The Growing World of Design-Build,” written by FMI senior consultant Paul Trombitas, estimates that design-build project delivery will increase by 18% between 2018 and 2021, and comprise 44% of total construction spending, or the equivalent of $1.19 trillion over that four-year span.  

A sustained emphasis toward educating owners and project stakeholders on the process and benefits associated with design-build has facilitated continued adoption and greater utilization industrywide. On the public side, increased design-build legislation has helped push the adoption of such projects. On the private side, owners tend to select design-build for unique and challenging projects that require lots of collaboration.

Design-build is projected to account for 44% of all construction spending for the years 2018 through 2021. Image: FMI

 

Of the various customer segments that use design-build, manufacturing, road infrastructure, and education will represent the greatest percentage of design-build construction spending over the next three years, states FMI.

In addition to larger and more complex projects, design-build continues to expand into project sizes of less than $25 million, as owners continue to gain exposure to the benefits of the delivery method.

However, design-build has its own set of challenges that, according to FMI principal Bill Spragins, revolve around the differing roles assumed by the parties, the number of decisions that must be made simultaneously, and the increased speed of decision-making associated with compression of the design and construction cycle.

For example, a project is potentially set up fail when owners confine their use of this delivery method to procurement without aligning the decision-making and approval processes within the organization to meet scheduling needs. A project can also be derailed by misaligned expectations between the owner and design-builder regarding the level of control that the owner’s team retains over design decisions.

Consequently, for a design-build delivery method to work, specific parameters need to be established about project scope, scheduling, and who’s responsible for what.

FMI states that AEC firms looking to win design-build projects need to think strategically: What slices of the market are they targeting, who are the right customers, what services do they need, and how do these offerings set a firm apart from its competition?

 

FMI recommends that AEC firms take a customer-focused approach when trying to win design-build contracts. Image: FMI

 

FMI uses a “4C model” to illustrate the context of profitable growth. Its starts with defining the business “climate” that the AEC firm is operating in—from demographics to regulations—and then digging deeper into possible changes, expectations, and needs of customers

AEC firms need to find out what criteria owners use to select contractors. They also need to weigh their own strengths and weaknesses against competitors’ for a given project.

FMI singles out a number of steps for winning design-build projects:

•Build a compelling story about why your firm is right for the project

•Build a go-to-market strategy that defines customers before an RFP hits the street

•Think like a customer

•Find out what the customer wants and why it’s important.

•Put your time where your strategy is. Build in organizational capacity that’s centered on a key focus, such as spending time with customers in advance.

The paper provides some avenues for minimizing stress points that can arise during a design-build contract. Having early and continued alignment among all project owners and stakeholders can help remove or limit these issues.

Make sure you completely understand requirements or other bidding assumptions, particularly on design-build projects. Of the projects FMI studied, 25% fell victim to this. At times, even the owner won’t understand the true impact of some of the requirements that are written into the contract.

Make sure there are formal internal hand-off meeting(s) between estimating/preconstruction and project management/field operations. This should include subcontractor involvement in planning the work.

Within the design-build arena, public-private partnerships (P3s) have emerged as a way for public and private sector entities to align on the provision of assets and the delivery of services and then effectively manage that partnership. To assemble the most successful P3 project teams, contractors should:

•Build your expertise through strategic joint ventures. Pick your partners carefully.

•Plan comprehensively for project complexities. Be smart about your business decisions.

•Understand the cost and risk barriers to entry. You need deep pockets and a thick skin.

•Have a deep understanding of an owner’s “ecosystem.”

•Start building relationships with public officials and finance representatives now.

•Collaborate and innovate.

Related Stories

Building Team | Feb 25, 2016

Long-time BD+C editor Gordon Wright, 1939-2016

Gordon Wright, whose career at BD+C spanned 32 years, passed away on February 15, at the age of 76. 

Building Team | Feb 10, 2016

DBIA disputes study claiming design-build projects often delivered on time, over budget

Says study did not account for owner-initiated scope changes.  

Building Team | Jan 7, 2016

4 reasons the C-suite should care about design-led construction

Lou Astorino shares four examples how a unified approach can directly help C-suite leaders achieve their organizational goals.

Sponsored | Building Team | Dec 16, 2015

How to fix 3 common mistakes AEC teams make in project interviews

In a LinkedIn post, Scott Johnson, business writing specialist at Johnson Training Group, highlights three common missteps that AEC firms make during project interviews. His insights are based on more than 90 interviews conducted with members of various selection panels.

Sponsored | Building Team | Dec 7, 2015

Why employee advocacy is key to social media success

Employee advocacy is key to boosting social media engagement, and employee advocacy is about more than just the promotion of a firm’s brand.

Sponsored | Building Team | Nov 30, 2015

5 ways to bring data into marketing and business development

Here are five ways to use data to enhance the client acquisition process

Cultural Facilities | Nov 23, 2015

BIG plans for Pittsburgh: Bjarke Ingels’ Lower Hill District master plan evokes hilly topography

Paths will be carved to create a dialogue between Pittsburgh’s urbanscape and its hilly surroundings.

Sponsored | Building Team | Nov 17, 2015

The benefits of selling your firm to employees

One business advisor recommends professional services businesses to develop a group of employees who are willing and able to buy the business

Sponsored | Building Team | Nov 2, 2015

Recruiting for cultural fit

Hiring for culture fit doesn’t mean hiring people who are all the same

Building Team | Oct 28, 2015

Steven R. Zirkel named president of Metl-Span

Metl-Span announced that Steven R. Zirkel has joined the company as the new president. Metl-Span is an industry leader in providing insulated metal panel products for increasing usage in institutional, commercial, industrial and cold storage markets.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




Giants 400

Top 75 Engineering Firms for 2023

Kimley-Horn, WSP, Tetra Tech, Langan, and IMEG head the rankings of the nation's largest engineering firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021