A new report on office fit-out costs in North America sets out to establish a range of benchmarks for three different office styles, and to suggest what businesses favor which style.
JLL’s project and development services group, which produced the report, used data from more than 2,800 JLL-managed project budgets for over 100 clients from 17 industries in 59 markets throughout the U.S. and Canada.
The goal, says JLL, is to “elevate the conversation” around the real costs of building out various real estate designs. This year’s report includes office layout and space quality components to allow for evaluations of different office layouts, project complexities, and materials. It also provides high, medium, and low allowances for furniture, fixtures, and equipment (FFE); as well as for the installation of audio-visual and security equipment.
The result is an Office Fit Out Matrix, which shows how a handful of dynamics affect fit-out costs. Depending on the market and style, the costs range from $120.18 per sf to $216.07 per sf (see chart).
JLL breaks down these costs by region and metro market. The Northeast and Northwest consistently have higher fit-out costs. The medium costs in New York City are 28.5% above the U.S. average. In San Francisco, a fit-out would cost 22.6% more than the U.S. average. Conversely, the medium fit-out costs in West Palm Beach, Fla., are 15.9% below the national average; in Austin, Texas, 15.3% below.
This office fit-out matrix is based on data from over 2,800 project budgets in North America that JLL managed. Image: JLL
JLL's matrix compares the medium costs for fitting out three different office styles. Image: JLL
Three office styles examined
JLL divides its office fit-out costs along three styles:
• A Traditional office is still the most expensive to fit out. This style has the highest percentage of private office spaces, and typically between 20% and 50% fewer employees than the other two styles. Its FFE costs are the highest among the three styles, too. And tenant factors are “relatively small,” says JLL, because there is less common area. These offices are still favored by law firms, financial services companies, and businesses that focus on privacy with their offices.
JLL observes that some Traditional office styles are introducing lower-partition bench desks.
• A less-expensive fit-out, a Moderate office style features “agile” floorplans, with 10% dedicated to enclosed offices, and the rest of the space open with 6x6-foot workstations and minimal benching and guest space. Moderate offices—which are 20-25% less dense than Progressive office styles—include a healthy mix of conference rooms, and a few multipurpose and collaborative spaces. The hard fit-out costs for the Moderate style are average, but cost efficiencies can be captured by adding more bench-style desks.
• The Progressive office style is distinguished by an open floorplan, 100% of its desk space outfitted as bench-style furniture with zero enclosed spaces. This style’s focus is on activity-based working. Its employee density is 20-50% higher than a Traditional office, and it has double the amount of collaborative and conference spaces. (A standard plan would include 20 conference rooms and seven open collaborative/multi-use spaces.)
JLL points out that Progressive fit-outs generally have higher technology costs, but save money on FFE spending.
Landlords allowing for more upgrades
Last year, nearly 69 million sf of new office space were delivered to the market, but only 47.4% was preleased. JLL’s report observes that landlords are spending more to compete for tenants that are consistently gravitating toward high-quality spaces and assets. Consequently, landlords are offering better tenant improvement packages.
JLL cites several reasons for this trend, including the steady climb in construction costs, which increased on average by 15% last year. Landlords also offer better tenant improvement packages to offset the impact of higher rents.
The national average for tenant improvement allowances was $44 per sf, ranging from $105/sf in Washington D.C. to $28/sf in Nashville.
The report provides detailed snapshots of several markets, such as Austin, one of the country’s dynamic office markets, with robust growth supply. There are 3.1 million sf of new office space in Austin’s pipeline, 36% of which is preleased. The average tenant improvement allowance there last year was $45/sf.
There’s 7 million sf of new office space in the pipeline in San Francisco, where the office vacancy rate is 9.1%, and 68.8% of new space is preleased. The average tenant improvement allowance in San Francisco last year was $60/sf.
Related Stories
| Jul 21, 2014
Workplace trends survey reveals generational patterns in office use
Data analysis from Mancini•Duffy indicates significant variations among age cohorts in the workplace.
| Jul 20, 2014
Why every major U.S. city should be nurturing ‘Innovation Hubs’
Today, more than ever, tech districts are the key to economic growth for metro markets. A new report from the Brookings Institution calls tech hubs the superchargers of innovation economies and creators of highly coveted tech jobs.
| Jul 18, 2014
Contractors warm up to new technologies, invent new management schemes [2014 Giants 300 Report]
“UAV.” “LATISTA.” “CMST.” If BD+C Giants 300 contractors have anything to say about it, these new terms may someday be as well known as “BIM” or “LEED.” Here’s a sampling of what Giant GCs and CMs are doing by way of technological and managerial innovation.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Construction Management Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Jacobs, Barton Malow, Hill International top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest construction management and project management firms in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Contractors [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Turner, Whiting-Turner, Skanska top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest contractors in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
Engineering firms look to bolster growth through new services, technology [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Following solid revenue growth in 2013, the majority of U.S.-based engineering and engineering/architecture firms expect more of the same this year, according to BD+C’s 2014 Giants 300 report.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Engineering/Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Jacobs, AECOM, Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest engineering/architecture firms in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Engineering Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Fluor, Arup, Day & Zimmermann top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest engineering firms in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Gensler, Perkins+Will, NBBJ top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest architecture firms in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
2014 Giants 300 Report
Building Design+Construction magazine's annual ranking the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S.