flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Convenience ranks highly when patients seek healthcare

Healthcare Facilities

Convenience ranks highly when patients seek healthcare

Latest JLL survey finds consumers are open to telehealth and retail clinics.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | June 27, 2023
JLL's new patient survey finds consumers seeking lower costs and convenience.
Customer satisfaction can start with how close the patient is to healthcare services. Image and charts: JLL

Healthcare consumers are just as likely to factor in convenience as they do cost when deciding where to seek care and from whom, according to a new survey of 4,037 American adults about their attitudes and preferences as patients.

The survey, conducted from April 19-28 by JLL, in many ways confirms the obvious: that older generations seek preventive care more often than younger generations; that insurance coverage is a primary driver for choosing a provider or hospital; and that the quality of service affects the patient experience.

Nearly eight of 10 of the survey’s respondents had received at least one type of non-dental care in the last year. Women, who accounted for 51% of the survey’s respondents, are more likely to receive care overall, but men are more likely to receive emergency care.

Age determines frequency of care
A patient's age often determines the need for more frequent care.
 

The likelihood of a primary care or specialist visit increases with age: 80% of adults 65 years or older have two or more chronic conditions that require continuous care. More than 70% of Baby Boomers (who accounted for 29% of the survey’s respondents) had received primary or preventive care within the last year, compared to only 26% of Generation Z.

Younger generations are more reactive than preventive in their healthcare decisions, borne out by the survey’s finding that Millennials and Gen Zs (43% of the survey's respondents) are more likely to receive urgent care, emergency care, and outpatient behavioral healthcare than older adults.

Proximity to patients counts

 

Travel by care type
Most patients aren't willing to travel more than a half hour for healthcare.

When care is urgently needed, “decision factors are simplified,” the survey states, and location and proximity of care are ranked higher as decision-making factors. But even outside of emergencies, convenience ranks high among factors for patients seeking care.

There’s no denying that cost is always in the background of any healthcare decision. “Accept my insurance” was the most common factor for choosing a provider among the survey’s respondents. (82% of participants has private insurance, and 81% has public insurance.)

Two-fifths of respondents said they travel less than 15 minutes to receive care, and nearly eight of 10 respondents travel less than 30 minutes. Among those with appointments in standalone medical offices, 85% ranked location as convenience, which the survey suggested indicates the advantages of a dispersed location strategy.

“A strong location strategy can improve reach for health systems and physician practices and potentially improve care outcomes,” JLL writes. “But there is a balance between convenience and cost—health systems need to balance the benefits of being close to their target population with the cost of a new facility or doctors’ time in transit from a local clinic to the hospital.”

Convenience is also key both in location and in being able to navigate to care. Patients want to get to care quickly and get on with their day. Ease of parking and ability to navigate the facility also affected a facility’s net positive score in the survey.

One of the survey’s more revealing findings is that nearly three-fifths of respondents—58%—went to another location—such as a pharmacy, or an urgent clinic—as part of their trip for healthcare.

Patients are making other stops during healthcare trips.
Patients are likely to be making other stops when they travel for healthcare.

Word of mouth often defines quality of care

Patients seem to be open to diverse care choices. For example, 29% said they have visited a retail clinic, such as a CVS, and would do so again. Gen Z and Millennials are more likely to frequent retail clinics for their convenient appointment schedules and shorter wait times.

More than two-fifths of respondents—42%—had a telehealth appointment within the last year, which was slightly down from the 45% in JLL’s 2022 survey. This year’s poll also found that 29% of telehealth appointments led to an in-person visit.

More than 40% of respondents ranked “reputation of quality” among the top five factors for choosing care. But where they get their impressions about quality varies.

Referrals play a larger role in specialist, outpatient surgery and inpatient care. Recommendations from friends ranked most highly for behavioral health, given the personal nature of such care, and was ranked in the top five by 31% of respondents. Younger patients, who “have yet to develop brand loyalty,” according to the survey, are more likely to rely on word-of-mouth recommendations than older patients for whom hospital systems’ reps matter more.

Outpatient surgery and primary care ranked highest for provider satisfaction; emergency care ranked lowest. Participants ranked their experiences on 12 aspects of care, and the biggest gap between “promoters” and “detractors” was for the service level of providers. Primary care had the highest net provider score, with 86% of respondents ranking its care as “attentive.”

Some amenities draw patients

Amenities can draw patients
Healthcare as a mixed-use component is attractive to some patients.

While not a decision-making factor, amenities do attract some patients. Among the survey’s respondents, 63% said they would be interested in visiting a healthcare facility with an additional amenity, such as alternative medicine, a restaurant, fitness center, or spa. (This inclination was more evident among younger respondents.)

The overall quality of facilities, including the comfort of their waiting rooms, can impact a patient’s choice, especially for inpatient, urgent, and emergency care. The survey also found that urban locations have lower favorability rankings for their facilities, signaling room for improvement. (Just under half—48%—of respondents live in the suburbs.)

Related Stories

| Sep 3, 2014

Ranked: Top local government sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

STV, HOK, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest local government design and construction firms, as reported in the 2014 Giants 300 Report.

| Sep 3, 2014

New designation launched to streamline LEED review process

The LEED Proven Provider designation is designed to minimize the need for additional work during the project review process.

| Sep 2, 2014

Ranked: Top green building sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

AECOM, Gensler, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest green design and construction firms. 

| Sep 1, 2014

Ranked: Top federal government sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Clark Group, Fluor, and HOK top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest federal government design and construction firms, as reported in the 2014 Giants 300 Report. 

| Aug 26, 2014

6 lessons from a true IPD project: George Washington University Hospital

In its latest blog post, Skanska shares tips and takeaways from the firm's second true integrated project delivery project.

| Aug 22, 2014

Before & After: Hospital upgrade shows shifting needs in healthcare construction

Community Hospice of Northeast Florida took an outdated 10-bed inpatient hospice unit and created a space that would meet the needs of patients receiving end of life care by creating a place that felt like home.

| Aug 6, 2014

25 projects win awards for design-build excellence

The 2014 Design-Build Project/Team Awards showcase design-build best practices and celebrate the achievements of owners and design-build teams in nine categories across the spectrum of horizontal and vertical construction. 

| Aug 5, 2014

Risk scanning: A new tool for managing healthcare facilities

Using well-known risk analytics applied to pre-existing facility data, risk scanning can provide a much richer view of facility condition more consistent with actual management decision making. 

| Aug 1, 2014

Best in healthcare design: AIA selects eight projects for National Healthcare Design Awards

Projects showcase the best of healthcare building design and health design-oriented research.

| Jul 29, 2014

Blood center uses architecture to encourage blood donation [slideshow]

Designed by FAAB Architektura, the project's aesthetic was guided by its function. The color scheme, facade panel glossiness, and the irregularly elevated leitmotif were intentionally designed to evoke the "richness" of blood, according to the architects. 

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Healthcare Facilities

Watch on-demand: Key Trends in the Healthcare Facilities Market for 2024-2025

Join the Building Design+Construction editorial team for this on-demand webinar on key trends, innovations, and opportunities in the $65 billion U.S. healthcare buildings market. A panel of healthcare design and construction experts present their latest projects, trends, innovations, opportunities, and data/research on key healthcare facilities sub-sectors. A 2024-2025 U.S. healthcare facilities market outlook is also presented.




Mass Timber

British Columbia hospital features mass timber community hall

The Cowichan District Hospital Replacement Project in Duncan, British Columbia, features an expansive community hall featuring mass timber construction. The hall, designed to promote social interaction and connection to give patients, families, and staff a warm and welcoming environment, connects a Diagnostic and Treatment (“D&T”) Block and Inpatient Tower.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021

Â