flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Controversy rages over cost, benefits of proposed OSHA silica dust rule

Controversy rages over cost, benefits of proposed OSHA silica dust rule

Opponents say new regulations would cost too much and that agency should focus on enforcement of existing rules


By BD+C Staff | May 3, 2014

OSHA’s proposal to beef up regulations on workers’ exposure to silica dust is generating a lot of controversy. The agency says current rules are outdated, difficult to understand, and inconsistent across industries.

Introduced in August 2013, the proposal would lower allowable levels of crystalline silica in all workplaces, standardize how the dust is calculated, and require medical monitoring for employees exposed to high levels.

OSHA estimates that 688 deaths and 1,585 silica-related illnesses would be prevented every year under the new rules. Opponents charge that the stricter regulations cost too much for the potential benefits. Joseph Brennan, a Cleveland attorney quoted in Crain’s Cleveland Business, said that since 1968, the rate of lung diseases related to silica has dropped by 90%. He indicated that stronger enforcement of existing rules might be a better way for OSHA to handle the issue.

Fred Hubbard Sr., secretary treasurer for the Ohio-Kentucky Administrative District Council of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, said OSHA seems to concentrate enforcement on only the biggest contractors. If a measure is going to impose a lot of costs onto work sites, it should be enforced across the board, he said. The union does support OSHA’s proposed stricter regulations, though.

OSHA has received about 2,000 comments on the proposal. The agency wrapped up public hearings on April 4. No timeline has been released, but OSHA’s final decision could be at least two years away.

(http://www.crainscleveland.com/article/20140413/SUB1/304139997/osha-proposal-is-causing-a-bit-of-a-dustup)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jul 15, 2019

USGBC calls for proposals for feedback, concepts for next LEED version

The move follows successful public input on LEED 4.1.

AEC Tech | Jul 15, 2019

Lack of standards hampers development of exoskeleton industry

Guidelines, common terminology, and testing methodology are needed, says expert. 

Concrete | Jul 8, 2019

Concrete repair code requirements released

American Concrete Institute offers guidance on assessment, repair, rehab of existing concrete structures.

K-12 Schools | Jul 8, 2019

Collaborative for High Performance Schools releases 2019 Core Criteria Version 3.0 Update

The update adds credits to lower carbon footprints and to promote climate change resiliency.

Wood | Jul 8, 2019

Campaign launched to promote ‘climate-smart wood’

The Forest Stewardship Council and other groups aim to help buyers understand and make it easier to locate lumber that meets sustainable forestry standards.

Urban Planning | Jul 8, 2019

U.S. cities experience ‘Doppler shift’ in walkable urban development

The walkability trend is spreading to urbanizing suburbs.

Codes and Standards | Jun 27, 2019

Construction workers need continuous skills upgrades

A report by Autodesk and Deloitte focuses on how workers can succeed in an automated world.

Codes and Standards | Jun 27, 2019

Updated standard for liquid applied flashing for exterior wall openings released

AAMA document establishes minimum performance requirements.

Codes and Standards | Jun 27, 2019

Public restrooms being used for changing clothes, phone conversations, and 'getting away'

About 60% of Americans use a public restroom one to five times a week, according to the latest annual hand washing survey conducted by Bradley Corporation.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021