flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Controversy rages over cost, benefits of proposed OSHA silica dust rule

Controversy rages over cost, benefits of proposed OSHA silica dust rule

Opponents say new regulations would cost too much and that agency should focus on enforcement of existing rules


By BD+C Staff | May 3, 2014

OSHA’s proposal to beef up regulations on workers’ exposure to silica dust is generating a lot of controversy. The agency says current rules are outdated, difficult to understand, and inconsistent across industries.

Introduced in August 2013, the proposal would lower allowable levels of crystalline silica in all workplaces, standardize how the dust is calculated, and require medical monitoring for employees exposed to high levels.

OSHA estimates that 688 deaths and 1,585 silica-related illnesses would be prevented every year under the new rules. Opponents charge that the stricter regulations cost too much for the potential benefits. Joseph Brennan, a Cleveland attorney quoted in Crain’s Cleveland Business, said that since 1968, the rate of lung diseases related to silica has dropped by 90%. He indicated that stronger enforcement of existing rules might be a better way for OSHA to handle the issue.

Fred Hubbard Sr., secretary treasurer for the Ohio-Kentucky Administrative District Council of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, said OSHA seems to concentrate enforcement on only the biggest contractors. If a measure is going to impose a lot of costs onto work sites, it should be enforced across the board, he said. The union does support OSHA’s proposed stricter regulations, though.

OSHA has received about 2,000 comments on the proposal. The agency wrapped up public hearings on April 4. No timeline has been released, but OSHA’s final decision could be at least two years away.

(http://www.crainscleveland.com/article/20140413/SUB1/304139997/osha-proposal-is-causing-a-bit-of-a-dustup)

Related Stories

| Mar 13, 2014

USGBC hits back at Environmental Policy Alliance criticism

The Washington, D.C.-based Environmental Policy Alliance has launched a campaign to make the claim that LEED-certified buildings are less energy efficient than other buildings. In response, USGBC told its members: "Don’t be fooled, the Environmental Policy Alliance isn’t the 'EPA' you might think."

| Mar 13, 2014

North Carolina board recommends switch to six-year code update cycle

In a nine to six vote, the North Carolina State Building Code Council on March 11 approved moving the commercial building code (except for the electrical code) to a six-year cycle for updating instead of a three-year cycle.

| Mar 13, 2014

OSHA’s funding disclosure requirement for those offering silica rule comments draws ire

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is requiring those who submit comments on the silica rule to disclose their funding sources for their scientific research to avoid conflict of interest.

| Mar 13, 2014

EPA publishes ‘best management practices’ rule on erosion, stormwater at construction sites

The Environmental Protection Agency published a new rule this month that will require the construction, housing, and utility sectors to carry out "best management practices" in order to prevent erosion and harmful stormwater discharges at construction sites.

| Mar 5, 2014

San Francisco board seeks remedies to code enforcement complaints

Two supervisors charged that a lack of adequate code enforcement has led to blight from dilapidated or unfinished buildings. 

| Mar 5, 2014

Obama proposes $1 billion for climate change risk mitigation

President Barack Obama would spend $1 billion to “better understand the projected impacts of climate change,” encourage local action to reduce future risk, and fund technology and infrastructure that will be more resilient to climate change.

| Mar 5, 2014

Southern Forest Products Assn. revamps pressure-treated pine specifications

It provides information to assist with the proper specification and use of pressure-treated Southern Pine materials. 

| Mar 5, 2014

UL, PRI Construction Materials Technologies reach product certification agreement

Underwriters Laboratories (UL) Inc. reached an agreement with PRI Construction Materials Technologies LLC (PRI) through which PRI will participate in UL's "Data Acceptance Program," enabling the acceptance of data generated at PRI toward UL product certification.

| Mar 5, 2014

Quebec's building code doesn't meet needs of its aging population

The issue was raised in the wake of a tragic fire at a seniors' residence in L'Isle-Verte. 

| Mar 4, 2014

Massachusetts Congressional delegation asks FEMA to slow flood zone map requirements

After a recent successful challenge of the scientific methodology used to redraw the coastal high-hazard zones, the Massachusetts congressional delegation is asking federal officials to put the brakes on new flood zone maps for the Bay State.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021