flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Controversial California solar power incentive proposal would reduce subsidies

Codes and Standards

Controversial California solar power incentive proposal would reduce subsidies

Plan intended to encourage customers to install power storage systems.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 3, 2022
Solar panels

Courtesy Pixabay

California regulators have proposed significant changes to the state’s solar incentive program, drawing strong opposition from industry advocates.

The new policy would reduce net-energy metering payments to solar customers for the excess power they generate and add monthly charges for customers. The changes would affect consumers and businesses who already have rooftop panels and customers that install new PVs.

The California Public Utilities Commission said the proposed changes are intended to encourage consumers to install battery storage systems so they can store excess power generated by solar panels and supply it back to the grid later. The Commission also addressed a perceived advantage enjoyed by wealthier ratepayers who have been more likely to install PVs due to the high up-front cost.

The current net-energy metering policy “disproportionately harms low-income ratepayers,” the Commission says. The proposed changes include a $600 million fund to help low-income customers access distributed clean energy.

Related Stories

| Sep 1, 2011

Project Aims to Automate Code Compliance Assessment

FIATECH, a consortium of owners from the industrial, power, and retail markets that build large structures, launched a project this year to validate the use of automation technology for code compliance assessment, and to accelerate the regulatory approval process using building models. Long-term objectives include the development of an extensive, open-source rule set library that is approved by industry and regulatory bodies for use by technology developers and code officials.

| Sep 1, 2011

EPA Says Additional Lead Paint Cleaning Rules Not Necessary

The EPA has concluded that current Lead: Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program (LRRP) cleaning requirements and lead-safe work regulations are sufficient to protect the public from lead dust hazards. “Our members have been instrumental in contacting legislators to detail the detrimental impact of the current LRRP," says Richard Walker, American Architectural Manufacturers Association’s president and CEO. “This collective industry voice has prompted the EPA to make the responsible decision to refrain from adding further, unnecessary costs to homeowners under the current economic climate."http://www.aamanet.org/news/1/10/0/all/603/aama-commends-its-members-congress-for-vacating-lrrp-clearance-rule

| Aug 11, 2010

Best AEC Firms of 2011/12

Later this year, we will launch Best AEC Firms 2012. We’re looking for firms that create truly positive workplaces for their AEC professionals and support staff. Keep an eye on this page for entry information. +

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021