flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry report shows increased use of robotics on jobsites

AEC Tech

Construction industry report shows increased use of robotics on jobsites

BuiltWorlds’ annual Tools, Equipment, and Robotics Benchmarking Report reveals trends in construction robotics adoption, preference, and hesitation.


By BuiltWorlds | September 25, 2024
Builder operating drone with remote control at construction site. Aerial photography
Photo courtesy Adobe Stock

BuiltWorlds, a member network dedicated to inspiring and advancing innovation in the AEC industry, has released its 2024 Tools, Equipment, and Robotics Benchmarking Report, an annual report that presents user survey data on category-specific technology adoption and usage. The report revealed that while the industry has been slow to adopt robotic solutions en masse, there has been considerable progress in certain areas, with one provider in particular seemingly pulling ahead as the preferred provider.

“The integration of advanced tools, equipment, and robotics represents a significant leap toward modernizing and streamlining operations within the AEC industry,” wrote BuiltWorlds Research Analyst Audrey Lynch, who authored the report. “This year, we saw the highest levels of adoption in monitoring robotics and service/labor robotics, two of the four main categories we've identified in construction robotics”

Nearly two-thirds of contractors surveyed, who cited use of robotics on jobsites, are either using monitoring and/or service/labor robotics. Thirty-five percent admitted to using autonomous heavy equipment, and a paltry 6% prefabrication robotics.

Construction industry robotics usage
Image courtesy BuiltWorlds

“There is a confluence of factors that are all working in tandem to drive increased utilization of robotics in the construction industry. The primary push forward is an increasingly prominent labor shortage in the industry,” said Tyler Sewall, Senior Director of Research for BuiltWorlds. He added, “Meanwhile, the typical barriers to adoption are slowly waning, leading to an environment more receptive to robotic solutions. The increased use of BIM, improved operability and accuracy, improved data collection and utilization, and an industry more culturally inclined to new technologies have all yielded material increases in the use of robotics.”

A Leading Provider in Dusty Robotics 

Among the multiple robotic technology solutions providers named in the report, one provider stood out as both most implemented as well as highest rated: Dusty Robotics, a company that builds robots to help in laying out jobsites. 

“Dusty Robotics consistently outperforms the industry average across all evaluated criteria, indicating its strong market position,” Lynch wrote. “With top ratings in adoption/utilization, ease of use, coordination with site activities, and data integration, the solution demonstrates its effectiveness and user-friendliness. It also excels in installation/performance speed and quality (tied with Civ Robotics), highlighting its reliability and efficiency.”

Construction industry-identified robotics solution implementation rates
Image courtesy BuiltWorlds


Why ‘Better Adoption’ Isn’t ‘Mass Adoption’ 

But while this year’s report shows wider scale adoption than years previous, particularly in the areas of service/labor and monitoring robotics, the industry has yet to embrace robotics into its mainstream. 

“As much as the case for robotics continues to grow,” Sewall said, “there are, frankly, still so many reasons why robotics adoption isn't widespread, and may not be for a while.”

For one, most robotic solutions, he explained, require some variety of building model in order to operate. 

“BIM, while well-adopted in some markets, is significantly underutilized in large portions of the industry.” 

Construction organizations that use robotics solutions
Image courtesy BuiltWorlds

Another reason, Sewall shared, is that robotics, like any new technology, comes with a certain amount of risk—which is a problem in a traditionally risk averse industry.

“With layout robots, for instance, the second question is always, ‘Who owns the layout,’” he explained. “If the general contractor dictates how layout will be done, does that change the owner of the risk?” 

Finally, and most obviously, is the cost. 

“The up-front costs of robotic solutions are expensive,” Sewall said. “While larger companies can support these costs, many small- and mid-sized contractors simply cannot support any additional spend.”

Still, while there remain significant barriers to mainstream adoption of construction robotics, the data seems to indicate a slow acceptance and utilization of a technology that represents a massive boost to safety, efficiency, and productivity. 

Related Stories

AEC Tech | Dec 20, 2017

6 CFD post-processing tips to improve visualization productivity and quality

Southland Engineering’s Abdullah Karimi offers helpful tips for making computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models more productive.

Sponsored | Building Team | Nov 3, 2017

4 strategies for marketing your AEC firm

Having a clearly defined competitive brand and a fine-tuned marketing approach can give your firm a significant competitive advantage.

Sponsored | AEC Tech | Oct 19, 2017

3 reasons why your firm needs cloud software

For firms looking to propel their architectural design services to new heights and levels of sophistication, a consolidated cloud-based platform is a valuable asset.

AEC Tech | Oct 6, 2017

How professional bias can sabotage industry transformation

Professional bias can take the form of change-resistant thinking that can keep transformational or innovative ambitions at bay. Tech consultant Nate Miller presents three kinds of bias that often emerge when a professional is confronted with new technology.

AEC Tech | Aug 25, 2017

Software cornucopia: Jacksonville Jaguars’ new practice facility showcases the power of computational design

The project team employed Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Kangaroo, and a host of other software applications to design and build this uber-complex sports and entertainment facility. 

AEC Tech | Aug 24, 2017

Big Data helps space optimization, but barriers remain

Space optimization is a big issue on many university campuses, as schools face increasing financial constraints, writes Hanbury’s Jimmy Stevens.

Lighting | Aug 2, 2017

Dynamic white lighting mimics daylighting

By varying an LED luminaire’s color temperature, it is possible to mimic daylighting, to some extent, and the natural circadian rhythms that accompany it, writes DLR Group’s Sean Avery. 

Office Buildings | Jul 20, 2017

SGA uses virtual design and construction technology to redevelop N.Y. building into modern offices

287 Park Avenue South is a nine-story Classical Revival building previously known as the United Charities Building.

Accelerate Live! | Jul 6, 2017

Watch all 20 Accelerate Live! talks on demand

BD+C’s inaugural AEC innovation conference, Accelerate Live! (May 11, Chicago), featured talks on machine learning, AI, gaming in construction, maker culture, and health-generating buildings.

| Jun 13, 2017

Accelerate Live! talk: Is the road to the future the path of least resistance? Sasha Reed, Bluebeam (sponsored)

Bluebeam’s Sasha Reed discusses why AEC leaders should give their teams permission to responsibly break things and create ecosystems of people, process, and technology.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




AEC Tech

Are AI opportunities overwhelming design and construction firms?

A new survey of A/E firms found that more than three-fifths of 652 respondents expect AI to improve their operational efficiency. That survey, though, also found that the same portion of respondents wasn’t using AI yet, and two-thirds admitted they were struggling with where and how to apply AI.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021