flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Oct 15, 2019

Utah adopts 2018 International Energy Conservation Code

Provisions include increased building envelope performance and reduced air infiltration.

Codes and Standards | Oct 14, 2019

States continue to beef up energy efficiency codes

ACEEE 50-state scorecard finds latest IECC code gaining adherents.

Codes and Standards | Oct 9, 2019

DOE releases Better Buildings Healthcare Financing Primer

Outlines financial strategies to implement energy-efficiency projects in healthcare.

Codes and Standards | Oct 8, 2019

Zero Carbon Buildings for All aims for ambitious emission reduction targets

Organization makes commitment to net zero carbon for all buildings by 2050.

Codes and Standards | Oct 7, 2019

Tailgating remains a critical building security threat, say security professionals

Few buildings provide beefed up provisions to counteract threat.

Codes and Standards | Sep 27, 2019

Open source tool allows comparison of embodied carbon emissions from construction materials

Enables carbon-smart choices during material specification and procurement.

Codes and Standards | Sep 27, 2019

AIA declaration: Climate change requires ‘holistic approach’

Must address interdependencies among people, buildings, infrastructure, and the environment.

Codes and Standards | Sep 26, 2019

San Jose’s new building energy code is the most stringent among large cities

New regulations aim to make zero-emission electric buildings the norm.

Codes and Standards | Sep 26, 2019

Building support for climate action depends on linking it to health, economic benefits

USGBC report finds most people don’t think environmental problems significant enough to prioritize action.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021