flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Dec 2, 2019

New GBCI certification recognizes expertise in sustainability

Provides third-party verification of competency to ‘making the world more economically, socially, and environmentally sustainable.’

Codes and Standards | Dec 2, 2019

New tool allows users to learn how to reduce embodied carbon

Calculator delivers first digitized EPDs.

Codes and Standards | Dec 2, 2019

Trade group challenges St. Petersburg, Fla., ordinance on construction contract mandates

Legality of requirement to hire apprentices, disadvantaged workers at issue.

Building Owners | Dec 2, 2019

What building owners and AEC teams need to know about New York’s Climate Mobilization Act

On April 18, 2019, the New York City Council passed the Climate Mobilization Act, a suite of laws aimed to meet the city’s commitment to achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.

Codes and Standards | Nov 26, 2019

Updated ASHRAE standards focused on ventilation design, air quality in residential applications

Standard 62.1 and 62.2 updates provide new tables of ventilation rates per unit area.

Codes and Standards | Nov 25, 2019

Real estate professionals say coworking is not a flash in the pan

More than 60% say coworking space is in their portfolios.

Codes and Standards | Nov 22, 2019

Utility’s proposal threatens California’s rooftop solar mandate

Would allow customers to use solar farms instead of installing their own PVs.

Codes and Standards | Nov 21, 2019

Number of LEED commercial building projects surpasses 100,000

More than 2.6 million sf of space being certified each day.

Codes and Standards | Nov 19, 2019

Most U.S. voters support licensing standards for architects

NCARB survey shows strong support for architecture as a licensed profession.

Codes and Standards | Nov 18, 2019

Cambridge, Mass., teams up with utility on energy retrofit program

Buildings large than 25,000 sf targeted in initiative to further carbon neutrality goal.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021