flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 7, 2020

New certification program for rigid core luxury vinyl tile

ASSURE CERTIFIED to establish industry-wide quality standards.

Codes and Standards | Jan 7, 2020

Boston’s beefed up wetlands ordinance will limit development

Conservation commission must consider future climate impacts when assessing new projects.

Codes and Standards | Jan 6, 2020

States pick up the slack in efficiency policy as federal government lags

With climate change deniers setting policy in Trump Administration, progress continues in statehouses.

Codes and Standards | Jan 6, 2020

OSHA plans multiple revisions to rules impacting construction industry in 2020

Cranes and derricks, welding in confined spaces, beryllium exposure, and more on docket.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2020

Labor supply and capability of workers worry contractors

Three out of four firms plan to add workers in 2020.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2020

Car-free streets could become common in major cities

New York and San Francisco establish thoroughfares dedicated to transit, pedestrians.

Codes and Standards | Jan 2, 2020

CRE professionals have increased interest in embodied carbon accounting, smart buildings

Survey also shows that interest in resiliency lags behind.

Codes and Standards | Jan 2, 2020

White paper focuses on Metal Composite Material labeling

Document part of effort to uphold industry standards for the product.

Codes and Standards | Dec 18, 2019

Hard Rock Hotel collapse in New Orleans puts spotlight on undocumented workers

Having helped rebuild the city after Hurricane Katrina, many under threat of deportation.

Codes and Standards | Dec 18, 2019

Maryland lawmakers take on blocked sidewalks during construction projects

Legislation clarifies developers’ responsibilities.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021