flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Apr 29, 2020

New York City tightens restrictions on construction during pandemic

Dept. of Buildings has issued more than 100 violations and stop-work orders.

Codes and Standards | Apr 28, 2020

ASHRAE, WELL panels to tackle revising standards to limit spread of viruses in buildings

Will examine ways to reduce infectious threats through building designs and operations.

Codes and Standards | Apr 24, 2020

Dept. of Labor issues guidance for respiratory protection during N95 shortage

Elastomeric respirators or powered, air-purifying respirators, and expired N95s are allowable alternatives

Codes and Standards | Apr 23, 2020

Group will create ecosystem for smart building data

Seven Finnish companies aim to integrate all technical systems into a single platform.

Codes and Standards | Apr 23, 2020

COVID-19 epidemic demonstrates value of flexible hospital space

Some rooms being repurposed for ICU care.

Codes and Standards | Apr 15, 2020

Embodied carbon footprint can be reduced by using conventional materials

High-SCM concrete, and cellulose and wood fiber insulation among the greener alternatives.

Coronavirus | Apr 13, 2020

COVID-19 alert: City conducts a 'virtual building inspection' to allow Starbucks and bank to open

Bothell, Wash., issues a certificate of occupancy to developer after inspecting the property online. 

Codes and Standards | Apr 13, 2020

Design competition focuses on reducing urban heat island effect

Cool Abu Dhabi aims to transform urban life in the Middle East.

Codes and Standards | Apr 13, 2020

What building science says about reducing COVID-19 transmission

Impact of temperature and relative humidity is unclear.

Codes and Standards | Apr 9, 2020

Owners retrofitting properties, monitoring performance during epidemic

Covid-19 outbreak may lead employers to reevaluate office commitments.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021