flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jul 15, 2020

Softwood-lumber duties boost expenses amid COVID-19 outbreak

Little hope this year for resolution of trade dispute with Canada.

Codes and Standards | Jul 14, 2020

Metal Construction Assn. releases three EPD updates

Pertain to Metal Composite Materials, Insulated Metal Panels, and Roll Formed Aluminum and Steel Cladding.

Codes and Standards | Jul 13, 2020

5 must reads for the AEC industry today: July 13, 2020

4 technologies for improving building sanitation and tech's ever-evolving impact on the multifamily space.

Codes and Standards | Jul 9, 2020

Funding opportunity for field validation of high-impact building technologies

Dept. of Energy program targets dynamic interactions with electric grid.

Codes and Standards | Jul 8, 2020

Standards for reducing risk of COVID-19 in senior living communities

AIA releases strategies and illustrations for the sector.

Codes and Standards | Jul 6, 2020

Guide presents benefits of public-private partnerships

Discusses process from project conception to construction.

Codes and Standards | Jul 1, 2020

COVID-19 public health guidelines may be downplaying building systems solutions

Emphasis on cleaning surfaces overlooks importance of mechanical infrastructure.

Codes and Standards | Jun 30, 2020

WELL building institute steps up health safety rating for hotels and resorts

Certification body forms advisory group of industry leaders and health experts.

Codes and Standards | Jun 30, 2020

7 must reads for the AEC industry today: June 30, 2020

Affordable housing comes to the Bay Area and this is not the end of cities.

Codes and Standards | Jun 29, 2020

Mandated building retrofits are necessary to meet climate crisis

Performance standards could greatly reduce GHG emissions.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021