flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Aug 17, 2020

ASCE seeks comments on seismic standard

Pertains to design criteria for nuclear facilities.

Codes and Standards | Aug 13, 2020

COVID-19 reboot guide offers strategies for reopening K-12 schools

Looks at space considerations for reopening at different scales.

Codes and Standards | Aug 12, 2020

Document provides guidance for mass timber construction

Overview of Intl. Building Code requirements included.

Codes and Standards | Aug 11, 2020

Inefficient air conditioning is a key contributor to global warming

More efficient equipment and buildings could make a big difference.

Codes and Standards | Aug 10, 2020

Concrete Institute and Post-Tensioning Institutes expand partnership

Will collaborate on new structural post-tensioned concrete code requirements.

Codes and Standards | Aug 6, 2020

SpeedCore demonstrates excellent fire resistance without additional fire-protective coatings

New York City approves metal-concrete product for all five boroughs.

Codes and Standards | Aug 5, 2020

Designing, redeveloping communities for zero energy needed to address climate change

District heating and cooling systems boost efficiency.

Codes and Standards | Aug 4, 2020

Virginia is the first state to adopt COVID-19 worker safety rules

Include social distancing requirements, notifications when co-worker tests positive, timelines to return to work after recovery.

Codes and Standards | Aug 3, 2020

Report aids local governments on policy options, pathways to electrify new buildings

Document focuses on switching appliances and equipment away from natural gas, propane.

Codes and Standards | Jul 30, 2020

Institute for Market Transformation acquires Energy-Efficient Codes Coalition

Goal is to achieve net-zero construction by 2050.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021