flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 5, 2021

EPA finalizes first major update to Lead and Copper rule

Will accelerate pace of lead service line replacement.

Codes and Standards | Jan 5, 2021

Flood risk for affordable housing expected to triple by 2050

Some communities will have 90% of their affordable housing at risk.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2021

Ranks of remote workers expected to double in five years

Nearly 23% of employees will work from outside of offices.

Codes and Standards | Dec 28, 2020

CSI and ASTM standards can now be connected through a central location

CROSSWALK web service accesses standards specific to projects from feasibility to turnover.

Codes and Standards | Dec 28, 2020

Dept. of Energy offers Better Buildings Field Validation Results Hub

One-stop-shop for information associated with technology validations in buildings.

Codes and Standards | Dec 28, 2020

2021 Defense Authorization Act includes mass timber provision

Directs defense, agriculture secretaries to review potential for wood frame construction on defense building projects.

Codes and Standards | Dec 28, 2020

New York City proposal would require rainwater detention tanks for new development

Rule would apply to projects on lots sized 20,000 sf or larger.

Codes and Standards | Dec 17, 2020

Energy efficiency as a service gaining ground as financing approach for adopting innovations

Building owners can invest in new technology with no upfront cost.

Codes and Standards | Dec 16, 2020

Resources available to address Legionella threat

Buildings reopened after extended pandemic closure are at risk.

Codes and Standards | Dec 16, 2020

New Specifications for Concrete Construction reference manual released

Scope expanded to include shotcrete, internal curing, mineral fillers, and recycled concrete aggregates.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021