flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Apr 19, 2021

Failed landmark preservation effort in Chicago provides lessons for planners

Gentrification fears heightened among Pilsen neighborhood residents doomed ambitious preservation plan.

Codes and Standards | Apr 14, 2021

New Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment standard debuts in 2021

Will affect 250,000 commercial real estate deals a year.

Codes and Standards | Apr 13, 2021

British Columbia moves to accelerate mass timber construction

Province funds demonstration projects as part of economic recovery.

Codes and Standards | Apr 12, 2021

WoodWorks and Think Wood release first Mass Timber Design Manual

Interactive collection of information on mass timber products, design best practices, taller wood construction and sustainability.

Codes and Standards | Apr 8, 2021

Sensors used in tunable lighting systems found to have high reliability

DOE study investigated items used to control lumen depreciation, chromaticity shifts, and changes in drivers.

Codes and Standards | Apr 7, 2021

Red tape ruined the U.K.’s home retrofit program

Lessons learned could help US avoid that fate.

Codes and Standards | Apr 6, 2021

Lendlease achieves net-zero carbon in Boston, Chicago multifamily portfolio

New projects in New York, Los Angeles on track to reach goal.

Codes and Standards | Apr 5, 2021

Specification for sliding door, lift and slide roller assemblies updated

Addresses market trend toward heavy sliding doors.

Codes and Standards | Apr 5, 2021

Construction employment rebounds in March following February drop

Rising costs, supply-chain woes, and cancellations threaten outlook.

Codes and Standards | Apr 2, 2021

Intl. Code Council’s new development system could be a brake on building decarbonization

Local governments lose influence on creating new energy efficiency rules.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021