flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Sep 3, 2021

Low-cost methods can have substantial impact on reducing embodied carbon

Whole-building design, material substitution, and specification strategies can slash carbon by up to 46%.

Codes and Standards | Sep 2, 2021

Case for power resiliency in buildings grows with more disaster and outages

Essential businesses like data centers, hospitals are first adopters of new storage systems.

Codes and Standards | Aug 31, 2021

UK industry group wants mandatory whole-life carbon assessments of buildings

Aims to address hidden emissions embedded in supply chains.

Codes and Standards | Aug 31, 2021

Home electrification will require code upgrades

Residential electric panel capacity must be increased.

Codes and Standards | Aug 30, 2021

Facebook’s new $800 million Arizona data center to save big on water

Will restore more than 200 million gallons of water per year to river basins.

Codes and Standards | Aug 26, 2021

California may require solar on new high-rise residential and commercial buildings

State energy commission approves proposal; Could become law in 2023.

Codes and Standards | Aug 25, 2021

Study finds racism, discrimination common in construction industry

NIBS to share best practices with industry leaders to improve worker treatment.

Codes and Standards | Aug 24, 2021

White paper addresses insulated metal panel specifications for roofs and walls

Pertains to provisions of the National Building Code of Canada.

Codes and Standards | Aug 24, 2021

KTGY releases free resource to reduce carbon footprint in multifamily developments

Helps navigate Denver Green Code measures—a series of voluntary codes.

Codes and Standards | Aug 19, 2021

Massive infrastructure bill includes hundreds of millions for building energy efficiency

Funds allotted for updated code implementation, construction technology, K-12 efficiency programs.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021