flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Dec 7, 2021

Design problems now the primary cause of construction claims and disputes

More likely to occur due to more tight timescales imposed upon third parties engaged in design.

Codes and Standards | Dec 5, 2021

New standard for Phase I environmental reports requires more research work on many sites

Update affects around 250,000 commercial real estate transactions a year.

Codes and Standards | Nov 30, 2021

Dept. of Energy publishes RFP for technical assistance on supporting better building codes

Addresses advanced standards to reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions.

Codes and Standards | Nov 29, 2021

FAA seeking design of air traffic control towers of the future

Call for design submissions for safe, efficient structures.

Codes and Standards | Nov 28, 2021

Efficient electric water heaters in multifamily buildings significantly reduce carbon emissions

In buildings with 5+ units, water heating uses more energy than space heating, cooling, or lighting.

Codes and Standards | Nov 23, 2021

New York’s Labor Law Section 240 and how it affects general contractors

The ‘Scaffold Law’ was first enacted by the New York State Legislature in 1885 and is one of the single most-used laws in construction accident cases.

Codes and Standards | Nov 22, 2021

ABC’s Construction Technology Report finds focus on solving operational problems

More than half rely on project management software.

Codes and Standards | Nov 22, 2021

Contractors say 811 utility location system has significant flaws

More than half of firms in survey report damages, near misses because lines were unmarked or marked incorrectly.

Codes and Standards | Nov 19, 2021

Creating net-zero/net-positive buildings is top priority in Green Building Trends 2021 report

Findings also demonstrate compelling business case for building green.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021