flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Energy Efficiency | Aug 28, 2015

North American Passive House Network e-book explains Passivhaus, net-zero techniques

Free guide includes spotlight on individual projects

Windows and Doors | Aug 28, 2015

Newly formed group challenges Florida building code

Window, door companies oppose provisions that raise costs

Codes and Standards | Aug 28, 2015

New Orleans becoming a model for climate resilience only 10 years after Katrina

The city has moved ahead with resilience strategies that may become a model for other communities

Codes and Standards | Aug 21, 2015

Illinois governor vetoes bill that would restrict condo owners’ rights

Bill would have made it harder to sue for building flaws

Codes and Standards | Aug 21, 2015

Post-Katrina roofing codes creating more resilient buildings on Gulf Coast

Ten years after storm, notable progress on stronger roofs, IBHS says

Smart Buildings | Aug 21, 2015

Federal Alliance for Safe Homes offers plan to strengthen codes for disaster resilience

Some states losing ground on resilience, group says

Codes and Standards | Aug 21, 2015

After disease outbreak, ASHRAE legionella standard adopted in New York

City Council acts after 12 die of legionellosis

Codes and Standards | Aug 13, 2015

Research indicates major earthquake looming for Pacific Northwest

Most structures built before seismic codes instituted; extreme damage predicted

Codes and Standards | Aug 13, 2015

New York City may allow affordable housing developers to ‘double dip’ in subsidies

New York City may allow affordable housing developers to ‘double dip’ in subsidies

Codes and Standards | Aug 13, 2015

L.A. considers controversial traffic calming measures

Goal is to encourage alternative transportation

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021