flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 25, 2016

Dept. of Energy releases decision guides for plug and process loads

Plug and process loads consume about 30% of the primary energy in U.S. commercial buildings today.

Codes and Standards | Jan 22, 2016

ConsensusDocs releases new multi-party IPD agreement and joining agreement

The documents serve as a comprehensive revision of previous IPD agreement

Codes and Standards | Jan 22, 2016

State Savings Calculator analyzes savings associated with energy codes

The calculator breaks down the cost-effectiveness of energy codes on a state-by-state basis.

Codes and Standards | Jan 22, 2016

Metal Roofing Seaming Guide published by Metal Construction Association

The free document is specifically tailored for metal roof installation.

Codes and Standards | Jan 22, 2016

Treasury Dept. will start crackdown on illicit money in luxury real estate

The move is expected to impact high-end condo development.

Resiliency | Jan 13, 2016

LEED credits on resiliency expected to influence future of building design

Post-disaster survivability is a key goal.

Codes and Standards | Jan 12, 2016

Batteries are the next step in raising sustainability standards

Battery technology will reduce electricity costs and promote a more stable, flexible grid.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2016

Denver broadens its use of design reviews as construction booms

Support strong, but some wary of giving more say to review boards.  

Codes and Standards | Dec 23, 2015

International Code Council approves updates based on NIST study of Joplin, Mo. tornado

Applies to schools and other high occupancy buildings.

Codes and Standards | Dec 21, 2015

Changing building codes to protect against mass shootings at odds with other safety measures

Fire and other emergencies require getting people out quickly, not locking down sections.  

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021