flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Sep 28, 2016

Society of Landscape Architects releases guide to resilient design

The goal is to retrofit communities to better withstand extreme weather events.

Codes and Standards | Sep 22, 2016

Construction firms pulling back from federal market due to new reporting rules

‘Subjective, very vague’ policies  are said to create too much risk.

Codes and Standards | Sep 21, 2016

Airbnb presents legal liability for multifamily owners

How building owners can reduce risks.

Codes and Standards | Sep 21, 2016

Healthy buildings becoming a key design priority for both architects and building owners

Nationwide survey finds nearly three of four architects cite health impacts influencing design decisions

Data Centers | Sep 19, 2016

New ANSI/ASHRAE data center standard is performance-based, more flexible

The aim of the standard was to ‘not stifle innovation.’

Codes and Standards | Sep 16, 2016

Calm weather tidal flooding impacting several communities on East and Gulf Coasts

Local officials face the prospect of costly mitigation projects.

Codes and Standards | Sep 15, 2016

OSHA appoints new director for its construction directorate

The forty-year industry veteran has been a GC and business owner.

Energy | Sep 13, 2016

Oberlin College to hold conference on post-fossil fuel economy

The gathering will address climate change and new sources of energy.

Industry Research | Sep 12, 2016

Evidence linking classroom design to improved learning mounts

A study finds the impact can be as much as 25% per year.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021