flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Feb 6, 2017

New York State offers $36 million for energy efficiency on commercial buildings

Programs will provide money for both owners and renters.

Codes and Standards | Feb 6, 2017

New white paper on modular bathroom pods offers insight on best uses

When to use them, cost, and installation are issues that are explored.

Codes and Standards | Feb 3, 2017

Justice in Design initiative to explore how to design a modern jail

The report will inform design principles for New York City jails.

Codes and Standards | Feb 1, 2017

Massachusetts, Colorado, Illinois lead annual Top 10 States for LEED Green Building list

LEED for Building Operations and Maintenance the most popular rating system in top 10 states.

Codes and Standards | Jan 31, 2017

Planning for world’s first floating city underway

New approach to resiliency examined in French Polynesia.

Codes and Standards | Jan 30, 2017

Denser development could reduce emissions more than building energy retrofits

More tightly packed cities would cut building emissions significantly, study says.

Codes and Standards | Jan 27, 2017

Calif. legislator proposes statewide solar mandate for new buildings

It would be the first such requirement in the U.S.

Codes and Standards | Jan 25, 2017

Standard baseline for measuring building efficiency needed

EUI could push sustainability through market-driven approach.

Codes and Standards | Jan 23, 2017

Workers, local officials rally for new construction safety law in New York City

The new law would require those who work on 10-story-plus buildings to go through an apprenticeship program.

Codes and Standards | Jan 23, 2017

Prominent Atlanta construction executive faces charges in $1 million bribery scheme

The company has worked on some major projects, including Hartsfield Airport.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021