flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Oct 5, 2017

California lawmakers pass bill that requires GCs to pay wages of sub employees if subs fail to pay

The measure will go into effect in January if the governor signs it.

Codes and Standards | Oct 4, 2017

Ambitious but realistic increase in clean energy would cut GHG emissions by 80% in the U.S.

NRDC report says goal can be achieved with existing tools.

Codes and Standards | Oct 3, 2017

Reducing duct leakage is focus on latest green building standards updates

ASHRAE 189.1 broadens testing requirements to include more types of ducts.

Codes and Standards | Oct 2, 2017

Nationwide retrofit strategy in Canada could cut 51% of emissions from large buildings

The roadmap provides government and industry with a targeted plan.

Codes and Standards | Sep 28, 2017

Resources available for new OSHA respirable crystalline silica regulation

NRCA offers compliance tools for contractors.

Codes and Standards | Sep 28, 2017

New tool compares HVAC system efficiency

IAPMO and Hydronics Industry Alliance unveil BEST to evaluate systems in early design phase.

Codes and Standards | Sep 26, 2017

Anti-drone technology can ward off unauthorized drone flights

The technology can be used to prevent terrorist attacks and spying.

Codes and Standards | Sep 25, 2017

How-to guide to renovating shopping centers available

E.U. research project focuses on energy efficiency and occupant comfort.

Codes and Standards | Sep 21, 2017

After construction crane collapses during Irma, regulations questioned

Cranes rated for 140 mph winds didn’t hold up to 100 mph gusts.

Codes and Standards | Sep 20, 2017

Energy efficiency measures pay off in some not-so-obvious ways

Access to better financing, tax incentives, rent premiums, among the benefits to greener buildings.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021