flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Apr 26, 2018

New standard supports community resilience

ASTM International guidance supports cost-effective ways to withstand and recover from disasters.

Codes and Standards | Apr 25, 2018

Lessons learned from decades of Superfund cleanups guide contaminated land reuse

Sites repurposed for residential, commercial use, and solar energy generation.

Codes and Standards | Apr 24, 2018

Vibrant downtown core the key for urban multifamily development

Nighttime activity makes the difference.

Codes and Standards | Apr 19, 2018

ILFI launches new Zero Carbon Certification

Offers greater flexibility around project fuel types and offsetting renewables.

Codes and Standards | Apr 18, 2018

New Green Globe pilot program launched

Precursor to revised Green Globes Assessment Protocol for Commercial Buildings.

Codes and Standards | Apr 17, 2018

Contractor charged with fraud in winning $200 million in federal contracts

Accused of falsely claiming veteran- and minority-owned business status.

Codes and Standards | Apr 16, 2018

Wide variations in adoption of National Electric Code could jeopardize safety

An NFPA report found that code adoption is under heavier political scrutiny, leading to delays and decisions motivated by factors other than safety concerns. 

Codes and Standards | Apr 12, 2018

Corruption in New York City construction industry is common

Scale of projects, number of players involved contributes to problem.

Codes and Standards | Apr 11, 2018

Urgent need for government to make communities, infrastructure more resilient

More than 350 people died from extreme weather events in 2017.

Codes and Standards | Apr 10, 2018

Boosting energy efficiency helps reduce health risks

Cleaner air results in fewer heart attacks, respiratory disease, and premature deaths.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021