flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Oct 2, 2018

Political will, tougher standards needed to reach carbon neutral goal

Stretch codes, more stringent credentials for designers, contractors, and inspectors may be needed.

Codes and Standards | Sep 27, 2018

Natural light is the most prized office perk

Employees crave sunshine and views of the outdoors more than cafeterias, fitness centers, and childcare.

Codes and Standards | Sep 26, 2018

Industry consensus needed for multifamily energy efficiency retrofit approach

Choice of insulating materials can impact indoor air quality, resident health.

Codes and Standards | Sep 25, 2018

New market forces disrupting global real estate development industry

Executives concerned about trade policy, labor shortages, approval processes.

Codes and Standards | Sep 21, 2018

More than 130 organizations petition OSHA to create heat protection standard for workers

Includes mandatory rest breaks, heat-exposure monitoring, record-keeping injury requirement.

Codes and Standards | Sep 20, 2018

North Carolina law banning use of recent climate science could worsen Hurricane Florence impact

Policies may have undermined ability to make coastal regions more resilient.

Codes and Standards | Sep 19, 2018

AIA endorses building owner participation in cap-and-trade programs

Would spur more energy conservation in buildings and cut carbon emissions.

Codes and Standards | Sep 18, 2018

ConsensusDocs Coalition publishes new Lean Addendum

Industry-first document to facilitate lean tools without need to sign multi-party IPD agreement.

Codes and Standards | Sep 13, 2018

As ICC prepares to vote on codes for tall wood buildings, opposition is still strong

Influential body will vote in October on new provisions to allow 18-story wood-framed structures.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021