flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry concerns with ‘Waters of the U.S.’ rule remain

Codes and Standards

Construction industry concerns with ‘Waters of the U.S.’ rule remain

EPA and Corps of Engineers rule may lead to a longer, more expensive permitting process


By Associated Builders and Contractors | May 27, 2015
Construction Industry Concerns with ‘Waters of the U.S.’ Rule Remain

The Mississippi River in Hennepin County, Minn. Photo: Bjoertvedt/Wikimedia Commons

Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) released the following statement on the “Waters of the U.S.” (WOTUS) final rule issued today by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps).

“ABC remains concerned that the Waters of the U.S. rule issued today will lead to an unnecessarily longer and more expensive permitting process for contractors which would undoubtedly harm the construction industry,” said ABC Vice President of Government Affairs Geoff Burr. “Throughout the rulemaking process the business community as a whole, state and local officials, as well as a bipartisan group of congressional lawmakers have opposed the considerable expansion of federal jurisdiction granted under the overreaching proposed rule.

“Increased regulatory compliance costs and a more drawn out approval process will harm the construction industry directly and indirectly as our industry’s growth relies largely on a growing economy as a whole,” said Burr. “We are still reviewing the regulations released with this rule today, but remain concerned that this poorly constituted proposal will have a negative impact on any current or proposed construction project that is near a jurisdictional ‘water’ as defined under the now broadened authority of the EPA or Corps.” 

The proposed rule would dramatically expand the scope of federal authority over water and land uses across the country and has met heavy opposition from a wide range of industries within the business community, abipartisan group of U.S. Senators, bipartisan group of members of the House of Representatives and the U.S. Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy.

ABC has been a vocal opponent of WOTUS since it was proposed in April 2014 and has:

To read ABC’s comments click here, to read the group of associations comments click here, to read the WAC comments click here

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Apr 9, 2020

Owners retrofitting properties, monitoring performance during epidemic

Covid-19 outbreak may lead employers to reevaluate office commitments.

Codes and Standards | Apr 7, 2020

Dept. of Labor publishes guidance on paid sick leave, expanded family and medical leave

Includes fact sheets for employees, employers, and a questions and answers document.

Codes and Standards | Apr 1, 2020

Standards and codes meetings halted, postponed

ASTM International cancels in-person standards meetings; DOE’s National Energy Codes Conference postponed.

Codes and Standards | Mar 26, 2020

Ransomware attack on Canadian contractor underscores need for cybersecurity

Victimized company Bird Construction has defense, law enforcement contracts.

Codes and Standards | Mar 23, 2020

Contractors should scrutinize contracts carefully amid Covid-19 crisis

Compliance with time-sensitive notice requirements and careful documentation required.

Codes and Standards | Mar 23, 2020

Florida legislature passes bill to reduce retainage on state and local projects

House and Senate vote is nearly unanimous; law would go into effect Oct. 1.

Codes and Standards | Mar 20, 2020

Feds prod use of eminent domain to force people out of flood-prone homes

Local officials that don’t comply could lose federal money to combat climate change.

Codes and Standards | Mar 19, 2020

ASHRAE provides COVID-19 resources for operating, maintaining HVAC systems

Includes recently approved position document on Airborne Infectious Diseases.

Codes and Standards | Mar 19, 2020

CaGBC launches new version of its Zero Carbon Building Standard

Version 2 draws on lessons from more than 20 zero carbon projects.

Codes and Standards | Mar 16, 2020

Concrete industry reduces carbon footprint by 13% over five years

Result mostly due to more efficient use of Portland cement.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021