flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry concerns with ‘Waters of the U.S.’ rule remain

Codes and Standards

Construction industry concerns with ‘Waters of the U.S.’ rule remain

EPA and Corps of Engineers rule may lead to a longer, more expensive permitting process


By Associated Builders and Contractors | May 27, 2015
Construction Industry Concerns with ‘Waters of the U.S.’ Rule Remain

The Mississippi River in Hennepin County, Minn. Photo: Bjoertvedt/Wikimedia Commons

Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) released the following statement on the “Waters of the U.S.” (WOTUS) final rule issued today by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps).

“ABC remains concerned that the Waters of the U.S. rule issued today will lead to an unnecessarily longer and more expensive permitting process for contractors which would undoubtedly harm the construction industry,” said ABC Vice President of Government Affairs Geoff Burr. “Throughout the rulemaking process the business community as a whole, state and local officials, as well as a bipartisan group of congressional lawmakers have opposed the considerable expansion of federal jurisdiction granted under the overreaching proposed rule.

“Increased regulatory compliance costs and a more drawn out approval process will harm the construction industry directly and indirectly as our industry’s growth relies largely on a growing economy as a whole,” said Burr. “We are still reviewing the regulations released with this rule today, but remain concerned that this poorly constituted proposal will have a negative impact on any current or proposed construction project that is near a jurisdictional ‘water’ as defined under the now broadened authority of the EPA or Corps.” 

The proposed rule would dramatically expand the scope of federal authority over water and land uses across the country and has met heavy opposition from a wide range of industries within the business community, abipartisan group of U.S. Senators, bipartisan group of members of the House of Representatives and the U.S. Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy.

ABC has been a vocal opponent of WOTUS since it was proposed in April 2014 and has:

To read ABC’s comments click here, to read the group of associations comments click here, to read the WAC comments click here

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 12, 2016

Batteries are the next step in raising sustainability standards

Battery technology will reduce electricity costs and promote a more stable, flexible grid.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2016

Denver broadens its use of design reviews as construction booms

Support strong, but some wary of giving more say to review boards.  

Codes and Standards | Dec 23, 2015

International Code Council approves updates based on NIST study of Joplin, Mo. tornado

Applies to schools and other high occupancy buildings.

Codes and Standards | Dec 21, 2015

Changing building codes to protect against mass shootings at odds with other safety measures

Fire and other emergencies require getting people out quickly, not locking down sections.  

Codes and Standards | Dec 18, 2015

Codes should be updated to reflect lessons learned from recent extreme weather events

More can be done to boost resiliency to flooding, extended power outages.

Codes and Standards | Dec 1, 2015

More than 50 design, construction, and real estate firms urge action on climate change

Call for policymakers to move on one of the ‘greatest economic opportunities of the 21st Century’

Codes and Standards | Oct 26, 2015

Chicago suburb considers bird collision deterrent requirement on all new buildings

The rule would mandate that new commercial, multifamily structures comply with LEED pilot program.

Codes and Standards | Oct 16, 2015

Anchorage may raise building height restrictions that would block precious winter sunlight

Controversial measure is part of plan to spur development.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Reconstruction & Renovation

Movement to protect historic buildings raises sharp criticism

While the movement to preserve historic buildings has widespread support, it also has some sharp critics with well-funded opposition groups springing up in recent years. Some opponents are linked to the Stand Together Foundation, founded and bankrolled by the Koch family’s conservative philanthropic organization, according to a column in Governing magazine.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021