The resolution of global construction disputes remained steady in 2016, and the average time it took to resolve those disputes declined  bit, according to the seventh annual Arcadis Global Construction Disputes Report 2017, which is subtitled “Avoiding the Same Pitfalls.”
This report reflects the construction disputes that Arcadis’ team handled around the world. The report infers that the roadblocks to expeditious and less cost dispute resolution often stem from the need for better contract administration, robust documentation, and a proactive approach to risk management.
“Our industry contains the best problem solvers in the world,” the report states. “But there often seems to be a lack of ability or willingness of the project participants to compromise and resolve disputes at the earliest and most inexpensive stage possible.” Roy Cooper, Senior Vice President of Arcadis Contract Solutions, attributes disputes to “human emotions that can impede settlements, as they do with physical factors such as differing site conditions and design errors.”
The world’s economic expansion generally is not seen as an impediment to resolving contract disputes. Global growth is projected at 3.5% in 2017, and 3.6% in 2018, according to the International Monetary Fund.Â
While the outlook is positive, the report sees risks in labor contraction, increasing commodities prices, and uncertain immigration policies. “A potential widening of global imbalances, coupled with sharp currency exchange rate movements, should those occur in response to major policy shifts, could further intensify protectionist pressures.”
Â
A summary of Arcadis' findings for 2016. Image: Arcadis US
Â
That being said, the global average construction dispute value declined in 2016 by nearly 7% to US$42.8 million (and that includes one US$2 billion dispute Arcadis handled). Asia averaged the highest dispute value, at US$84 million, and the United Kingdom saw a double-digit increase in its average dispute value, to US$34 million.
The global average length of a dispute also fell slightly last year, to 14 months. North America’s dispute duration was the longest of all Arcadis’ regions, an average of 15.6 months. For the third consecutive year, the most common cause for disputes in North America in 2016 was errors and/or omissions in the contract documentation.
Â
Â
Asia had the highest average dispute value last year; North America the longest time it took to resolve a dispute. Image: Arcadis
Globally, Arcadis identifies failure to properly administer a contract among the five most common causes of disputes, along with poorly drafted or incomplete/unsubstantiated claims; the failure of an employer, contractor or subcontractor to understand or comply with its contractual obligations; errors and omissions in the contract; and incomplete design information or employer requires.
The most common methods to resolve construction disputes were, in order of preference, party-to-party negotiation, arbitration, and mediation.
And the most important activities to avoid disputes were led by proper contract administration, accurate documents, and fair and appropriate risk and balances in contracts.
Related Stories
Market Data | Jan 10, 2023
Construction backlogs at highest level since Q2 2019, says ABC
Associated Builders and Contractors reports today that its Construction Backlog Indicator remained unchanged at 9.2 months in December 2022, according to an ABC member survey conducted Dec. 20, 2022, to Jan. 5, 2023. The reading is one month higher than in December 2021.Â
Market Data | Jan 6, 2023
Nonresidential construction spending rises in November 2022
Spending on nonresidential construction work in the U.S. was up 0.9% in November versus the previous month, and 11.8% versus the previous year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Industry Research | Dec 28, 2022
Following a strong year, design and construction firms view 2023 cautiously
The economy and inflation are the biggest concerns for U.S. architecture, construction, and engineering firms in 2023, according to a recent survey of AEC professionals by the editors of Building Design+Construction.
Self-Storage Facilities | Dec 16, 2022
Self-storage development booms in high multifamily construction areas
A 2022 RentCafe analysis finds that self-storage units swelled in conjunction with metros’ growth in apartment complexes.
Market Data | Dec 13, 2022
Contractors' backlog of work reaches three-year high
U.S. construction firms have, on average, 9.2 months of work in the pipeline, according to ABC's latest Construction Backlog Indicator.Â
Contractors | Dec 6, 2022
Slow payments cost the construction industry $208 billion in 2022
The cost of floating payments for wages and invoices represents $208 billion in excess cost to the construction industry, a 53% increase from 2021, according to a survey by Rabbet, a provider of construction finance software.
Mass Timber | Dec 1, 2022
Cross laminated timber market forecast to more than triple by end of decade
Cross laminated timber (CLT) is gaining acceptance as an eco-friendly building material, a trend that will propel its growth through the end of the 2020s. The CLT market is projected to more than triple from $1.11 billion in 2021 to $3.72 billion by 2030, according to a report from Polaris Market Research.
Market Data | Nov 15, 2022
Construction demand will be a double-edged sword in 2023
Skanska’s latest forecast sees shorter lead times and receding inflation, but the industry isn’t out of the woods yet.
Reconstruction & Renovation | Nov 8, 2022
Renovation work outpaces new construction for first time in two decades
Renovations of older buildings in U.S. cities recently hit a record high as reflected in architecture firm billings, according to the American Institute of Architects (AIA).
Market Data | Nov 3, 2022
Building material prices have become the calm in America’s economic storm
Linesight’s latest quarterly report predicts stability (mostly) through the first half of 2023