Should architects learn to code? This question was posed by computational design consultant Nathan Miller, Founder and Managing Director of Proving Ground, in a recent blog post about the rise of data-driven design. Miller’s answer: “Well, maybe.”
While Miller and other computation experts don’t expect every design professional to become Mark Zuckerberg in “The Social Network” (“Don’t interrupt him. He’s plugged in!”), there is no denying the growing importance of the utilization of data and computation in the design process. HDR, NBBJ, Populous, Thornton Tomasetti, and Woods Bagot are among the firms that are investing in talent and training to advance their CD capabilities.
ALSO SEE
6 ways smart AEC firms are using computational design methods
During his four-plus years as a CD consultant, Miller has assisted these firms and others in developing a business roadmap for breaking into data-driven design. We asked him for tips and advice on getting started. He offered the following:
1. Define the business value of computational design. Computational design is an open-ended methodology, not a class of software tools with predefined features for a specific uses.The value of computation is greatly dependent on how well an AEC organization positions the new skill sets, tools, and workflows relative to the business.
“I’m often confronted with questions akin to some variation of, ‘Can Grasshopper or Dynamo do X,’” says Miller. “The reality is quite the opposite: Computational design is about the process of creating solutions. The question is better framed as, ‘What can we create that will help us better solve X design problem?’”
It could involve developing an algorithm that can greatly increase the speed of solving repetitive design problems, or creating a tool for a project or market that can provide an advantage for a firm looking to differentiate its services in a competitive marketplace.
For CD to be meaningful to a business at scale means determining the desired outcomes, coupled with a strategic framework for developing a team capable of creating high-impact solutions, says Miller.
2. Pilot computational design services in the areas where your firm takes the most risks. AEC firms tend to be risk adverse when it comes to changing process. Factor in increasingly tighter deadlines and shrinking fees, and it can make computational design a hard sell to firm leaders.
‘Design organizations should be looking for do-it-yourself creative thinkers that have a knack for making digital tools.’
—Nathan Miller, Proving Ground
Miller says a number of his AEC clients have had success winning over firm leaders and scaling up CD operations by piloting these tools and processes in the areas of the practice where the firm traditionally takes more risks, namely project pursuits, RFPs, and design competitions.
“When you know you’re going up against strong competition and you want to take some calculated risks, those become very good entry points for computational design,” says Miller. “By going the computation route with an RFP or competition submission, it may allow the firm to explore a problem a little differently, or capture that process and fold it into the overall narrative.”
Win a few projects and light bulbs will start going off throughout the practice.
3. Hire for passion of building design, not for coding prowess. It’s much tougher to teach a game designer or software engineer about the building design process than it is to teach an architect or engineer basic coding skills. Many firms, however, are looking to the tech markets—computer science, simulation, software engineering, game development—to build their CD teams.
“Where the real moment with computational design concepts comes to bear is when you engage the opposite—give a couple of designers who are really passionate about buildings the skills to be able to code,” says Miller.
He has advised AEC clients to modify their job requisitions for entry-level designers coming out of school to include skill sets like experience with computational design software. “If you’re a firm looking to grow your CD capability, you need to change the demographic of the people applying for the position,” says Miller.
4. Invest in people, not software. Computational design software is a drop in the bucket compared to the six- and seven-figure investments firms have had to make in CAD and BIM software tools. Grasshopper is a free plug-in. Dynamo is open source. The tools are essentially free. The real investment is in finding the right people and then advancing their computation capabilities.
“As with most things that drive success in service organizations, people should be the focus of business investment for executing a successful computational design strategy,” says Miller. “Design organizations should be looking for do-it-yourself creative thinkers that have a knack for making digital tools.”
5. Apply the 70/20/10 ratio when assembling your computation-enabled design team. While no two firms are the same, Miller has discovered a sweet spot for the makeup of computation-enabled design teams: the 70/20/10 ratio. Seventy percent should have enough working knowledge to be able to “pull the levers” on pre-made computational tools; 20% should have a high comfort level with building simple tools and modifying complex project algorithms; 10% should have an advanced skill set in creating sophisticated tools and solutions.
Having a team with a range of skill sets, says Miller, will encourage broader participation, skill growth, and engagement across the organization.
Project leaders and firm management need to be active participants in the implementation process. “They don’t need to know the nuts and bolts of the tools, but they do need to understand how the project process is changing so they can give the team a platform to deliver valuable design solutions,” says Miller.
For more on computational design, read Proving Ground’s blog.
Related Stories
| Jan 30, 2014
See how architects at NBBJ are using computational design to calculate the best views on projects [video]
In an ideal world, every office employee would have a beautiful view from his or her desk. While no one can make that happen in real life, computational design can help architects maximize views from every angle.
| Jan 15, 2014
6 social media skills every leader needs
The social media revolution—which is less than a decade old—has created a dilemma for senior executives. While its potential seems immense, the inherent risks create uncertainty and unease.
| Jan 12, 2014
CES showcases innovations: Can any of these help you do your job better?
The Consumer Electronics Show took place this past week in Las Vegas. Known for launching new products and technologies, many of the products showcased there set the bar for future innovators. The show also signals trends to watch in technology applicable to the design and building industry.
| Jan 12, 2014
5 ways virtual modeling can improve facilities management
Improved space management, streamlined maintenance, and economical retrofits are among the ways building owners and facility managers can benefit from building information modeling.
| Dec 31, 2013
Top 10 blog posts from 2013
BD+C editors and our contributors posted hundreds of blogs in 2013. Here's a recap of the most popular topics. They include valuable lessons from one of the first BIM-related lawsuits and sage advice from AEC legend Arthur Gensler.
| Dec 31, 2013
BD+C's top 10 stories of 2013
The world's tallest twisting tower and the rise of augmented reality technology in construction were among the 10 most popular articles posted on Building Design+Construction's website, BDCnetwork.com.
| Dec 17, 2013
IBM's five tech-driven innovation predictions for the next five years [infographics]
Smart classrooms, DNA-based medical care, and wired cities are among the technology-related innovations identified by IBM researchers for the company's 5 in 5 report.
| Dec 16, 2013
Is the metal building industry in a technology shift?
Automation is the future you can’t avoid, though you may try. Even within the metal building industry—which is made up of skilled tradesmen—automation has revolutionized, and will continue revolutionizing, how we work.
| Dec 10, 2013
16 great solutions for architects, engineers, and contractors
From a crowd-funded smart shovel to a why-didn’t-someone-do-this-sooner scheme for managing traffic in public restrooms, these ideas are noteworthy for creative problem-solving. Here are some of the most intriguing innovations the BD+C community has brought to our attention this year.
| Dec 9, 2013
Does technology help or hinder innovation?
Whether digital technology will help or hinder workplace insights remains a topic of ongoing debate. FastCo.Design features insights from business scholars on both sides of the issue.
