flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Co-living: The next real estate disruptor or niche market?

Multifamily Housing

Co-living: The next real estate disruptor or niche market?

From a practicality standpoint, co-living makes complete sense for young, single, and highly mobile working professionals.


By David Barista, Editorial Director | August 14, 2017
Coworking space

Wikimedia Commons, Germanoparra

Six years after WeWork took the office market by storm with its breakthrough co-working real estate concept, the New York-based startup set its eyes on the next big opportunity for its communal real estate business model: co-living.

WeLive launched early last year with locations in Lower Manhattan and Arlington, Va., and the company has plans to expand to as many as 14 cities in the coming years.

WeLive turns the traditional multifamily rental model on its head. Gone is the long-term lease agreement; Tenants are “members” who can stay month to month, even day to day. Eventually, as the WeLive network expands, members will be able to move freely city to city, as needed, at no additional cost.

From a practicality standpoint, co-living makes complete sense for young, single, and highly mobile working professionals. The spaces are well designed, fully furnished, filled with attractive amenities, and come complete with all the niceties of modern living: towels and linens, housekeeping services, HDTVs, premium cable, high-speed WiFi, concierge staff, even free refreshments like tea, coffee, and fruit water. Think apartment complex meets hotel—but with a crucial twist.

The secret sauce, according to WeWork, is the “We” in WeLive: spaces and programs designed to foster a strong sense of community and connection with other members. Each location has a full-time community concierge team, which organizes events like movie nights, cocktail hours, and formal and informal meals in a communal kitchen. The mailroom and laundry room double as bars and event spaces, and amenities like a rooftop deck and a hot tub encourage tenants to meet and mingle.      

WeWork has no shortage of competitors in the co-living market space. Common, HubHaus, Krash, Node, Open Door, Pure House, and Roam Co-living are among the dozen or so startups that are aiming to profit from the mainstreaming of the “hacker house,” commune, or boarding house dwelling models. Investors have taken notice, and have pumped millions into these fledgling businesses. (Common, for instance, has raised more than $23 million from multiple investors since its founding in 2015. With this funding, the startup has opened 13 developments across four metros: Chicago, New York, San Francisco area, and Washington, D.C.)

While it’s too early to claim any of these budding businesses as a resounding success, the co-living craze is the latest example of the startup world looking to shake up the slow-to-evolve, $228 trillion (yes, trillion! tinyurl.com/REworth) global real estate market. Whether it’s Google, WeWork, or Airbnb—or countless other startups and tech firms—it is clear that investors see colossal dollar signs tied to disrupting the tried-and-true real estate and construction markets.

Will your firm join them?

Related Stories

Building Team | Jan 10, 2019

Skilled labor shortages continue to make off-site fabrication and construction attractive

But the AEC industry’s “culture” impedes greater acceptance, according to a recent National Institute of Building Sciences survey.

Building Team | Jan 7, 2019

2019 outlook: Firms not betting on another record-setting year

Despite the positive indicators for the market, AEC professionals remain largely cautious when it comes to growth prospects for 2019.

Building Team | Jan 4, 2019

Design-build delivery is setting new parameters for project management

FMI paper provides clues to what makes these contracts click (or not).

Building Team | Dec 11, 2018

And then there were two: HQ2 sites, in hindsight, seemed obvious

The two cities already had the greatest number of Amazon employees outside of Seattle.

Building Team | Oct 16, 2018

Dead lobby syndrome: An affliction only experience can cure

The competition for great tenants has rarely been as fierce as it is today.

Building Team | Aug 21, 2018

Five habits that are keeping your digital strategy from working

Strategies are always created with the best of intentions for improving business, the effort involved in executing the strategy – especially ones involving disruptive digital capabilities – is greatly underestimated.

Building Team | Aug 17, 2018

Silicon Valley is here. Get over it.

AEC firms continue to have angst about a tech-industry takeover of the market. One expert’s advice: “Embrace technology. Do not fear. You can shape it.”

Sponsored | Building Materials | Aug 1, 2018

Building for now... and the future

Metal building systems are often selected for large-sized structures, and with good reason.

Building Team | Jul 30, 2018

Construction tech is the new investment darling for VC funds

In the first half of 2018, venture capital firms invested $1.05 billion in global construction tech startups, setting a record high.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




Giants 400

Top 75 Engineering Firms for 2023

Kimley-Horn, WSP, Tetra Tech, Langan, and IMEG head the rankings of the nation's largest engineering firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021