The use of third parties to develop and own new medical real estate projects is increasingly viewed as an attractive option for health systems seeking ways to preserve and generate precious capital resources to fund acute care programs and market share growth. The right third-party developer can help health systems create medical facilities with market-competitive rental rates as well as provide several benefits, such as future flexibility for the hospital, avoidance of the legal exposure that may come with serving as a landlord to referring physicians, and a potential investment vehicle for physician-tenants.
However, the selection of a developer for a new project can create challenges for health system executives. To obtain the most competitive terms, hospitals usually issue a request for proposal (RFP) as part of the selection process. In addition to the time and effort dedicated to developing and managing the RFP, hospitals also may face challenges in keeping pace with the changing economics of the real estate development industry.
One of the biggest challenges health systems face when issuing a RFP is in maintaining maximum negotiating leverage for as long as possible when selecting a developer for a new project. Three critical steps can enhance the negotiating leverage of health systems when managing the developer selection process: understanding the risk-return profile of the equity backing the developer, establishing confidence in the developer's ability to achieve target value design, and diligently vetting all legal documentation associated with the project.
UNDERSTANDING THE EQUITY
A health system increases its likelihood of negotiating the best terms for a new project by understanding the dynamic of the equity source behind a developer. Although the demand for healthcare development projects among equity sources has significantly increased in recent years, the number of opportunities to place the equity remains below prerecession levels. The healthcare development market peaked in 2008 with $40.4 billion in private U.S. healthcare construction spending, and it remains 23 percent below that, at $31 billion, as of November 2015.
Total Private Construction Spending: Health Care
In a market with limited opportunities to place capital, low interest rates, and an abundance of debt and equity that is pursuing healthcare real estate, developer yields continue to compress for the most competitive projects, to the point that healthcare developers are much less likely to fund new projects through investment from "friends and family." Instead, developers looking to compete are seeking the most aggressive sources of capital, which typically take the form of equity from pension funds and publicly traded real estate investment trusts (REITs).
Although pension funds have the lowest cost of capital in today's market, their commitments to new projects are closely tied to the geographic location of the project and the credit of the health system. The most active state pension funds with allocations to healthcare real estate, usually advised through investment managers, include those in Alaska, Arizona, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Wisconsin and
Texas. As public pensions shift their asset allocation toward the "endowment model," which historically has had higher allocations in alternative assets, we expect this capital source to correspondingly increase allocations to commercial real estate. Pension funds are primarily seeking real estate development opportunities, including through health systems that are in primary and secondary markets with backing by investment-grade credit. Although pension funds may have very specific criteria, they typically are able to offer greater flexibility regarding forward equity commitments, ground lease structuring, and purchase options by the hospital sponsor, and ownership models for physician tenants.
Although public REITs have less flexibility than pension fund equity, they typically offer longer term stability. REITs, as an asset class, generally do not sell their owned facilities because each asset in their portfolio provides rental income that supports the payout of dividends to their shareholders. As a potentially infinite holder of real estate, REITs historically have served as a preferred equity source for health systems. However, REITs are more interest-rate sensitive than any other equity source for developers, and generally are unable to offer a fixed forward equity commitment more than 12 months in advance for any project. REIT stock prices tend to move counter to fixed-income interest rates, such as the 10-year Treasury note. As interest rates decrease, stock prices for REITs tend to increase because they pay investor dividends, which typically float between 4 and 5 percent. Investors faced with rising interest rates tend to move away from dividend-generating stocks and toward options with higher yields.
Select Healthcare REITs Versus 10-Year Treasury
BALANCING COSTS WITH DESIGN
During the developer proposal selection process, health systems should beware that the lowest yield does not always produce the lowest lease rate. Health systems typically emphasize the lease constant or developer yield, but pay less attention to the other variables in the equation, such as the cost of construction or miscellaneous fees.
A key question health systems should ask is whether the developer is experienced in achieving target value design (TVD) while delivering a state-of-the art facility. TVD delivers value to the health system through the design process while recognizing the importance of constraints such as construction costs. TVD was a target-costing practice popularized in Japan during the economically turbulent 1990s to create high-quality, cost-efficient facilities. The process aims to push the developer, architect, and general contractor to excel and innovate through the exclusion of standard approaches to design and construction. The use of financial targets and consideration of the expected value to the health system can drive creativity and problem solving. Developers often do not select their architect or general contractor before submitting their proposal to ensure that the hospital helps in the selection process for those positions and supports them. Hospitals can enhance their standard role in the selection process by reviewing a short list of the developer's proposed architects and general contractors to help gauge their historical success in achieving TVD.
As part of the selection process, health systems can go beyond simply analyzing the developer's fee by comparing miscellaneous fees, such as those for feasibility studies, project management, leasing, and financing. When miscellaneous fees surface after the developer is selected, the overall budget is increased, leaving the health system to ultimately grapple with a higher rental rate.
INVOLVING LEGAL EXPERTISE EARLY
Before beginning the developer selection process, health systems should determine their priorities. A memorandum of understanding should clearly state preferences regarding issues such as future options to purchase the facility, rights of first refusal to lease the space, specific ground-lease control provisions, and physician ownership models. The health system should share this document with the short list of developers in the final round of the selection process, and should request redline comments from the developer's legal counsel. At this point in the selection process, the involved parties generally are provided with key legal documents, such as the developer agreement, ground lease (if applicable), and space lease, to make a final selection. Although the developer may formally present the proposal, the legal documents often are provided for comment to the equity source backing the developer. A critical step is for the health system to review redline comments while it still has leverage, to bolster its negotiating position if the equity source responds with any comments that conflict with the health system's goals.
CONCLUSION
By running a detailed and competitive process from the beginning while in a position of leverage, a health system can benefit from a more streamlined process and from minimized risk after selecting a developer for a new project.
Footnote
a. Lease Constant: The developer and tenant agree on a factor (called a lease constant or developer yield) to be multiplied by the total development cost of the project to determine the initial annual rent. For example, if the lease constant/developer yield is 9 percent and the project cost for a 75,000-square-foot medical office building is $20 million, then the initial rent would be $1.8 million, or $24 per square foot.
About the Author: Chris Bodnar joined CBRE in 2003 and is an Executive Vice President of the Investment Properties division and co-leads the CBRE Healthcare Capital Markets Group with his business partner Lee Asher. Disciplined in the specialty of Investment Sales, Mr. Bodnar has been involved in the disposition of over 10 million square feet of commercial assets, exceeding a total value of $3 billion dollars on behalf of his clients since 2010.
Related Stories
| Feb 9, 2011
Hospital Construction in the Age of Obamacare
The recession has hurt even the usually vibrant healthcare segment. Nearly three out of four hospital systems have put the brakes on capital projects. We asked five capital expenditure insiders for their advice on how Building Teams can still succeed in this highly competitive sector.
| Jan 31, 2011
Cuningham Group Architecture launches Healthcare studio with Lee Brennan
International design firm Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A. (Cuningham Group) has announced the arrival of Lee Brennan, AIA, as Principal and Leader of its new Healthcare studio. Brennan comes to Cuningham Group with over 30 years of professional experience, 22 of those years in healthcare, encompassing all aspects of project delivery, from strategic planning and programming through design and construction. The firm’s new Healthcare studio will enhance Cuningham Group’s expertise in leisure and entertainment, education, mixed-use/housing and workplace environments.
| Jan 31, 2011
HDR Architecture Releases Evidence-based Design Videos
As a follow-up to its book Evidence-based Design for Healthcare Facilities, HDR Architecture, Inc. has released three video case studies that highlight evidence-based design principles in action.
| Jan 31, 2011
CISCA releases White Paper on Acoustics in Healthcare Environments
The Ceilings & Interior Systems Construction Association (CISCA) has released an extensive white paper “Acoustics in Healthcare Environments” for architects, interior designers, and other design professionals who work to improve healthcare settings for all users. This white paper serves as a comprehensive introduction to the acoustical issues commonly confronted on healthcare projects and howbest to address those.
| Jan 27, 2011
Perkins Eastman's report on senior housing signals a changing market
Top international design and architecture firm Perkins Eastman is pleased to announce that the Perkins Eastman Research Collaborative recently completed the “Design for Aging Review 10 Insights and Innovations: The State of Senior Housing” study for the American Institute of Architects (AIA). The results of the comprehensive study reflect the changing demands and emerging concepts that are re-shaping today’s senior living industry.
| Jan 21, 2011
Harlem facility combines social services with retail, office space
Harlem is one of the first neighborhoods in New York City to combine retail with assisted living. The six-story, 50,000-sf building provides assisted living for residents with disabilities and a nonprofit group offering services to minority groups, plus retail and office space.
| Jan 21, 2011
Research center built for interdisciplinary cooperation
The Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital, in Houston, the first basic research institute for childhood neurological diseases, is a 13-story twisting tower in the center of the hospital campus.
| Jan 19, 2011
Biomedical research center in Texas to foster scientific collaboration
The new Health and Biomedical Sciences Center at the University of Houston will facilitate interaction between scientists in a 167,000-sf, six-story research facility. The center will bring together researchers from many of the school’s departments to collaborate on interdisciplinary projects. The facility also will feature an ambulatory surgery center for the College of Optometry, the first of its kind for an optometry school. Boston-based firms Shepley Bulfinch and Bailey Architects designed the project.
| Jan 19, 2011
New Fort Hood hospital will replace aging medical center
The Army Corps of Engineers selected London-based Balfour Beatty and St. Louis-based McCarthy to provide design-build services for the Fort Hood Replacement Hospital in Texas, a $503 million, 944,000-sf complex partially funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The firm plans to use BIM for the project, which will include outpatient clinics, an ambulance garage, a central utility plant, and three parking structures. Texas firms HKS Architects and Wingler & Sharp will participate as design partners. The project seeks LEED Gold.
| Jan 10, 2011
Michael J. Alter, president of The Alter Group: ‘There’s a significant pent-up demand for projects’
Michael J. Alter, president of The Alter Group, a national corporate real estate development firm headquartered in Skokie, Ill., on the growth of urban centers, project financing, and what clients are saying about sustainability.
