Last year, in a tech report on artificial intelligence (AI), BD+C reported that Arup had applied a “neural network” to a light rail design and reduced the number of utility clashes by over 90%, saving nearly 800 hours of engineering.
The same report described an algorithm developed by workspace-sharing giant WeWork that is 40% more accurate than humans at predicting meeting room usage. The article proposed that machine learning is “still a theoretical proposition” for most of the AEC industry, even though the practical results of these examples suggest that AI has bridged the gap from theory to practice.
In fact, the consensus in our industry seems to be that AI’s limitations will always hold it back. In 2015, WeWork’s then Director of Research, Daniel Davis, declared that “it is—for now—impossible to get computers to think creatively, manage multidisciplinary teams, and do many of the other day-to-day tasks.” Citing University of Oxford research estimating that there’s a less than 2% chance that architects’ jobs will be automated, Davis concludes that architecture cannot be automated at all. (The statistics stickler in me wants to point out that 2% is not zero.)
As long ago as 2012, Wired’s Kevin Kelly insisted otherwise, predicting that automation in every industry was “just a matter of time.” “It doesn’t matter if you are a doctor, lawyer, architect, reporter, or even programmer. The robot takeover will be epic,” wrote Kelly.
ALSO SEE: 4 fundamental relationships between buildings and machines
And despite Davis’ claim that computers cannot “think creatively,” others forecast the opposite—that computers in fact will be responsible for the “coming creativity explosion.”
The underlying question here is simply this: Are machines capable of design? To answer that, we’d have to clarify the meaning of design, a surprisingly elusive term. One dictionary defines it as “an arrangement of lines or shapes created to form a pattern or decoration.”
Computer programs have been capable of automating this process since the early ’60s. Later that decade, in The Sciences of the Artificial (1969), Nobel economist Herbert Simon famously defined design as “devising courses of action aimed at changing existing situations into preferred ones.”
The examples from Arup and WeWork certainly demonstrate how to create “preferred situations.” Today, whole businesses are being founded around AI-driven design. Using a proprietary algorithm, California-based Cover can develop custom house plans within a few hours.
Nevertheless, many are skeptical. “I am convinced,” says innovation expert Nick Seneca Jankel, “that no computer, no matter how powerful, will ever be able to purposefully innovate an artistic breakthrough like hip hop, or a commercial one like Instagram. Breakthrough creativity is fundamentally organic, not algorithmic.”
Yet, this point of view suggests that computer processes will always be defined as they are now and will remain incapable of becoming “organic, not algorithmic.” Google’s Ray Kurzweil is certain that machines will achieve human-level intelligence in a decade and significantly outpace us thereafter. How can we possibly envision the capability of computers once they have exponentially exceeded our awareness?
So, instead of debating about whether machines can design, why don’t we ask, What if they could? How might architecture change if computers take over the process entirely?
Already, machine-driven procedures can dramatically improve the efficiency of design, construction, and operations—for example, by increasing energy performance and decreasing fabrication time and costs. Yet, often architects get in the way of these improvements because we insert our personal aesthetic preferences.
How much smarter could buildings get if we let them design themselves for optimal performance? A growing wealth of research is revealing how people respond to light, space, form, pattern, texture, and color, and much of this information could be automated during design. “Beauty is merely a function of mathematical distances or ratios,” explains computer scientist Daniel Cohen-Or, who invented a “beauty engine” that subtly improves photos—with an 80% success rate, according to polling.
So, if architects were to step out of the way and allow architecture to evolve beyond our imaginings, what kind of world might emerge? Louis Kahn famously asked, “What does the building want to be?” If Kurzweil is correct, and buildings achieve self-awareness soon, they could become what they want to be without asking us. Self-actualized architecture.
For now, the likelihood of architects letting go of their traditional services seems low. A BD+C reader survey in January revealed that 81% of designers believe that computers will never match human intelligence, and only half said that job losses would be justified if AI could create better buildings. This begs a big question: What do we value more—architects or architecture?
Lance Hosey, FAIA, LEED Fellow, is a Design Director with Gensler. His book, The Shape of Green: Aesthetics, Ecology, and Design, has been an Amazon #1 bestseller in the Sustainability & Green Design category.
Related Stories
AEC Tech | Feb 8, 2019
BI(m): BIM data without models
A new breed of data tools creates a valuable opportunity for the next wave of BIM and facilities management, one where “pure data” is at the center, writes John Tobin of SMRT Architects.
AEC Tech | Jan 9, 2019
Our robotic future: Assessing AI's impact on the AEC profession and the built environment
This is the first in a series by Lance Hosey, FAIA, on how automation is disrupting design and construction.
3D Printing | Dec 7, 2018
Additive manufacturing heads to the jobsite
Prototype mobile 3D printing shop aims to identify additive manufacturing applications for construction jobsites.
AEC Tech | Sep 27, 2018
BD+C editors want your input on AEC technology
Please help us improve our editorial coverage by taking this brief survey.
Sponsored | AEC Tech | Sep 14, 2018
Sponsored webinar: Benefits of traceable construction
In this free 60-minute webinar, Keith Alcorn of FARO Technologies will talk about the concept of traceable construction and how 3D reality capture solutions provide portable, efficient, secure, and forward-looking solutions for data collection, pre-processing, and evaluation in the design, build and operating phase. September 18, 2:00 EST.
AEC Tech | Jul 24, 2018
Weidt Group’s Net Energy Optimizer now available as software as a service
The proprietary energy analysis tool is open for use by the public.
Accelerate Live! | Jul 17, 2018
Call for speakers: Accelerate AEC! innovation conference, May 2019
This high-energy forum will deliver 20 game-changing business and technology innovations from the Giants of the AEC market.
Accelerate Live! | Jun 24, 2018
Watch all 19 Accelerate Live! talks on demand
BD+C’s second annual Accelerate Live! AEC innovation conference (May 10, 2018, Chicago) featured talks on AI for construction scheduling, regenerative design, the micro-buildings movement, post-occupancy evaluation, predictive visual data analytics, digital fabrication, and more. Take in all 19 talks on demand.
Sponsored | AEC Tech | Jun 15, 2018
4 project management mistakes to avoid at all costs
Helpful tips for managing projects more effectively
| Jun 11, 2018
Accelerate Live! talk: The smart jobsite — Predictive visual data analytics for proactive project controls
In this 15-minute talk at BD+C’s Accelerate Live! conference (May 10, 2018, Chicago), a trio of experts in predictive visual data analytics presents how design-build giant Clayco has leveraged this technology to achieve production efficiency on several construction sites.